Good news: Bole-Richard Yoram Ettinger
The Amnesty International report could not generate more acerbic comments and unbalanced from the permanent correspondent of the World, the daily Gothic night.
Operation Lead Cast of January 2009 would have killed 1,400 people, a figure drummed at will by any account of what detractors of Israel.
checks made from leaves appear the figure of 750 dead, most of which are "police" the Palestinians. But it is difficult for international organizations to achieve a correct account when making their investigations under the tight control of the Islamists of Hamas.
The figure of 350 civilian deaths can be reduced to 200 if it does not take into account those directly attributable to Hamas (executions summary, revenge and human shields).
240 police officers were killed, the report said. This figure is ridiculously low. Police officer on this term, it suffices to know that this title is given to almost any how, so long as the person is likely to carry a gun.
The "policemen in Gaza" are either members of Hamas, Al Qassam Brigades, and other splinter groups to Islamist ideology. When they
the shot and sending rockets at civilians in Sderot, they are "activists". When they are victims of Israeli response, they are police.
This flexibility in the definition of these characters helps maintain the blur their true motivations. But it is the expected result.
Fools Western, including our journalists only see the fire that left by the bombing.
Jean-Paul Belmont had warned in our columns, and this, from December 28, 2008: "Returning to their eternal rhetoric about the" cycle of violence ", the need for a" just settlement of the conflict " , appeal for calm "two parties", when they will not settle for a conviction Pure and simple to Israel, they will save face and give the impression of working for peace. "(read Operation Lead Cast: before the editorials)
When French soldiers killed in Afghanistan, accusing them Is there not being enough of them to die? Their attributes does one do we the victims of the fanatics they are fighting?
And if an extremist group dare rejoice ambushes in which soldiers fall and calls for the increase, he continued to glorify murder and the Minister of Interior is considering dissolution *.
But when it comes to Israel a different logic starts Instead, reversing the usual values and benchmarks.
Amnesty International has seized on the issue by sending a commission of inquiry, in parallel with that of the UN commission headed by the ineffable Goldstone.
July 2, 2009, Amnesty issued its 117-page report, which calls into question the actions of the IDF, and to a lesser extent, those of Hamas.
This report has the merit to report, albeit timidly, the atrocious practices of the Islamist movement, in frantic search of martyrs to give to the cause.
But there is the report and what journalists do.
The last delivery of Bole-Richard, correspondent of the World, is no exception.
His article is composed of 743 words. Of these 743 words, only 23 are devoted to the activities of Hamas.
Bole-Richard also notes with relish an assertion of false report by Amnesty, that Hamas would not have used human shields. This is in complete contradiction with the testimony of Gazans.
At most, Amnesty accuses Hamas of "installed military positions near houses, thus endangering the lives of civilians." In terms
suitors ... No word on summary executions, assassinations of Fatah members and other developments including Hamas regularly visits guilty since he took power by force and not through the ballot box.
743 words of contempt under the guise of information.
Donatella Roverra, head of Amnesty said that there were virtually no street fighting and that the IDF soldiers sank like butter in Gaza.
How does she know that? The answer is disarmingly she found no bullet casings in the street.
No sleeves? This is important and Bole-Richard fails not to lift it.
For if there was no street fighting between the two opponents, what can we attribute the destruction of many buildings, if not a systematic attempt to destroy the part of Israel?
's a good question to which we can respond in several ways. One can speculate that the brave fighters of Allah chose to flee and do nothing faced.
A mission of inquiry that takes place three months after the fighting does not find a socket in the streets and is surprised. One might reply that, even in Gaza, they have brushes. They even know the places that need cleaning and leave the rubbish where it should when it comes to providing photographers the view.
And the low number of casualties in the IDF alone is proof, according to Amnesty and Bole-Richard.
These two characters have forgotten a constant venomous strategic Israeli army for 60 years of fighting. This country is fighting for its survival.
The army takes the utmost care to protect its soldiers, who are also young people. The greatest precautions are taken to protect the point of having this protection in a battle quasi-science.
normal for a country whose fertility rate is well below that of its neighbors. But this science is not always accurate.
Bole-Richard is one of those people who would like Israel is only a parenthesis in history.
They believe that this country should be allowed to strike without retaliation, he does that happen ...
These people should be accustomed yet. At Drancy, too, there was only passing through.
Pierre Lefebvre © Primo, July 8, 2009 * The
CAPJPO
http://www.primo-europe.org/impression.php?numdoc=Ed-960883592
0 comments:
Post a Comment