Pinbewood Derby Template

Where are corrupt judges of corruption. Widespread corruption

The incredible deceit of the Constitutional Council.

I have in my latest book: The Dictatorship to the French , mentioned the hypocrisy that was the thing that is the Constitutional Council on the one hand, due to inbreeding of all its members with the nomenklatura corrupt governments they all come - enjoying the passage of the largesse of a Republic that gives her more illustrious apparatchiks on the decline a final rattle vain prestige and paid handsomely - and secondly, by the fact that these charlatans of the right of citizens are in the position of having to contradict what they had previously approved.

members of the Constitutional Council are thus, by this policy inbreeding and their failure to object to unfair laws and draconian - because they are undecided if they are captured, that is to say not often given the prolific number of texts regularly proclaimed idiots - in the unenviable position of being judge and jury. Members of this Council has previously been either business or parliamentary (legislative and executive), it is difficult not to have a clan solidarity groups to which they are derived and from which they derive their caste privileges.

In their decision No. 2010-14/22 of July 30, 2010, the so-called "wise men" have delivered their verdict on a question as to constitutionality related to the totalitarian excesses of the practice of custody, which has become in this country, the equivalent of lettres de cachet rampant under the Ancien Regime.

Their determination would have been in favor of the continued existence of this provision totalitarian, so convenient to all the corrupt governments, if there had been no prior decisions of the European Court of Human man stating that abusive practice as an infringement on individual freedoms. That is to say that despite the inclination to follow a class solidarity, our so-called "wise" found themselves caught between conflicting obligations, that of political complicity and that of the ethics of Justice, which is imperfect, however, that the extension of our sublime Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789 . This paradoxical situation is causing quite convoluted formulation used by the sophists and clean to mislead the common sense meaning of any citizen, to say, lip, one thing that was good yesterday - their eyes to the vision impaired as a hit ordinary vision of senility - No longer is today, and therefore that this practice became arbitrary excesses arising from the misuse that may have been making, and are always corrupt governments, is unconstitutional. ..

arduous journey for those who do not consider simplicity as a virtue Republican, then it is the very principle of DDHC of 1789 (constitutional principle), and an ardent obligation as the legislature and the executive branch.

Now therefore, in custody in its abuse has become largely an arbitrary act as soliciting, transmitting, executing, and are run as government officials as members of a techno to the image of corruption that they serve.

is a good and fair decision, and we can only regret that these so-called "wise men" will be shown so little inclination to put a quick end to a terrible totalitarian drift, leaving the door open for all those little tyrants top until the bottom of the techno, which, as in the last war, draped in a toga of respectability vain junk under the false pretext that they are only obeying orders and unfair laws.

From where I stand, that is to say that of an ordinary member of society, I can not help but notice that the ethics of members of the Constitutional Council is also narrower than their political consciousness . Here they are in front of arbitrary behavior proved infinitely damaging to individual freedoms and the spirit of even the most elementary justice and forgetting the founding principle of our Republic, I mean the Declaration of Human Rights and citizen in 1789, they did not bother to point out, as clearly indicated in Article 7, which they are yet reference, that the perpetrators of these arbitrary acts, and those who executed them: MUST BE PUNISHED.

Ignorant voluntarily the provisions of this Article 7, they have the same deliberately violated the provisions of Article 6 of that Declaration, the one resulting from the removal of privileges, establishes the principle of LAW, I think it is useful to recall some of the content:

Article 6 - The law is an expression of general will. All citizens have the right to participate personally or through their representatives in its formation. It must be the same for everyone, whether it protects or punishes.

Thus, our venerable elders of the Constitutional Council, those used by corrupt governments arbitrary practices are above the law and have the privilege of insolent power safely violate the Constitution.

This is already is already characterized the demonstration of the fallacy of this organization to help if disputable.

But there are even greater, as indeed some lawyers and journalists were able to meet, and that is that this practice abuse of police custody is recognized as unconstitutional, but it is still permitted by the Council of the Dictatorship, until ... 1 July 2011 ...

Recognize that in terms of deception they are revealed by this decision as stupid as dishonest, our guardians of the temple of corruption. Not only is there will be no penalty for extremely serious offenses previously committed, but in addition they are allowed for an additional period of one year ...

They all became mad with power and arrogance!

Recognize that is not in the ethics of these stooges wise to stop infringements of liberty and justice, and that they offered more cynically to play extra time. After that, try to understand the intransigence perfectly idiotic cop's violation and who you glue a ticket for exceeding the speed limit for two or three miles more.

If there is some tolerance in the practice of the totalitarian state, then according to the principle of common law, we must ask at least as great tolerance for all other possible offenses. And if, as I think it's fair that ie, there should be no tolerance for violation of constitutional law, then we must take him to court all the stresses of arbitrary acts previously committed, first to the last henchman Vizier, as would have said with this great Fairness was his, the Count of Mirabeau. Do not dream

, right or corruption Supreme preparing to bury the affair secret financing of political party in power, this government is not going to show honesty and fairness, would it just can?

I am sure not.

---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------

Does Cocaine On Gums Get You High?

The bottom of the case Sarkozy - Woerth - Bettencourt.

Far be it from me to come and give my two cents on what makes the current news on the secret funding of election campaigns.

believe that such a thing is possible in France, from a political gent whose recent past demonstrates his angelic purity, would be proof of an evil spirit, if not a really bad time. No, Francois Mitterrand was not the basis for the enormous undertaking procurement of pumping through the body URBA, among other tricks of the same species mafia ... No, the mayor of Paris, Jacques Chirac, did not receive bags of tickets and some Méric from the same origin: the corruption ... No, Edouard Balladur did not fund his presidential campaign by other than gifts of generous donors who came to attend his rallies with force of 500 euro notes in his pockets. 500 euro note that everyone knows it's the cut that runs only in the middle traffickers of all kinds, as well as corruption., not in the pockets of ordinary citizens. No, de Maistre has not received the Legion of Honour for anything other than his incredible dedication to an elderly person. Exceptional dedication, because Conversely thousands of volunteers doing the same thing with several seniors him he is cons rewards strength and luxurious gifts of all kinds, "that the nation deserves.

Far be it from me absurd to believe that such malpractices have been, are or will be possible. If such a calamity should happen one day, I have no doubt that justice so quick to punish any breach of the Highway Traffic Act, any ignorance to the plethora of stupid laws that hangs over the most modest citizen, will show an unrelenting severity against such offenders seriously undermine by their lack of honesty and decency, the basics of democracy, the Republic and of equal rights.

My purpose in this case Sarkozy-Woert - Bettencourt, is on another level, the bluster of our corrupt leaders, who - as I show in my latest book: The dictatorship to French - Imbued with their insolent privileges, for years now despise the rule of law common to come, unfortunately when we dare to attack their pseudo moral integrity, whining piteously before the microphones and cameras, none of which is default, and most importantly a prime time, to proclaim and protest against the violation of presumption of innocence ...

champion of duplicity and deceit I named: Michele Alliot-Marie, former Minister of the Army, which is known only within that dark shenanigans going on even modestly covered by the sordid secret defense, so contrary to the principle of transparency that builds loyalty and honesty. It has been one of Former Ministers of Interior, which is known how little they make the presumption of innocence by making our country one that, among the most developed countries, the greatest practical number of police custody and pretrial detention, under pretexts as inept as the old lettres de cachet, such as: disturbing public order in the interpretation more idle than the cop will be the most cantankerous and bounded (the two are not incompatible), a situation that is beyond our limited understanding in the exercise of its functions.

Michele Alliot-Marie, our current Attorney General, who comes to the rescue of this poor Woerth, trumpeting it enjoys the presumption of innocence when he is charged or in custody , and parallel to it, it never occurs to all cases infinitely many strong (per million), the presumption of innocence is violated by a judicial orders, and services of forces covered by the order the privilege of an insolent technostructure not having to meet the LAW. Principle also the constitutional presumption of innocence, as contained in the Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789.

Height of hypocrisy, she came to say, always a prime time, it should not violate the one hand the presumption of innocence, and that we should not second , convict without evidence. Personally I fully subscribe to these principles, but where I am amazed that when the master of the chancery is telling us what not to do when its services are exactly the opposite. I will not go on million acts of violations of the presumption of innocence that every citizen is subjected to daily, and never raised any emotion from our Attorney General, but as to say that we should not condemn evidence, then I think it pushes it beyond the cynical reason. Would she spent in profit or loss because of faulty memory, the fact that in France it is possible to be regularly condemned not on evidence but only on the firm belief that jurors can be highly manipulated by supervision of magistrates who, coincidentally, always get judgments along the lines of public opinion to guide the movement that our rulers can exploit skillfully ...

As figurehead of righteousness, equality of rights, respect for republican ethics and morals, there is no doubt that if we do that Michele Alliot-Marie to offer the social body , then it is more democracy and imp at law, but of Sodom and Gomorrah and banana republic.

Mr. Woerth, with his air of sad cocker just told us before the television cameras, the newspaper for 20 hours, the penalty he be accused of "unfairly" and seeing his honor thrown to the mercy of public opinion without any regard for the respect, again, of his presumption of innocence. He was head of the administration, which in history has been less respectful of the presumption of innocence. Administration, as I show in my book dictatorship to French (all parliamentarians and ministers have received), is one that respects the É rule of law when it suits , that might seem a hair insolent. Where it becomes the greatest comic is that 24 March 2009, this gentleman, during the 13-hour television news has come to lecture on public morality by denouncing the severance benefits that a point were perfectly legally incontestable, the former CEO of Valeo: Thierry Morin. At that time I wrote about this blog (article still appears) to denounce this act of treachery from one of the highest personages of the state, and infringed Article 5 of the Declaration Rights of Man and Citizen of 1789. Binding declaration law as stated at the beginning of the 1958 Constitution.

To read this article click here.

That Ms. Bettencourt is constantly under the watchful eye and "protector" of the techno more corrupt than we ever had, given the importance of the jam it represents, there is not surprising. But the most eminent representatives of government, under the authority and instructions of the President of the Republic, are publicly trample an already very ill Democracy, rule of law, respect for the Constitution, the Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789 , and above all justice without which there is no freedom possible, speaks volumes about the techno, our rulers and puppet Members who have exchanged the mandate they received from the sovereign people against small yard privileges ...

is what shows in the open, the bottom of the case Sarkozy - Woerth - Bettencourt, and it is far more calamitous than any secret funding campaign ...

-------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------

Can I Give My Dog Temazapan

When HHarry Met Sally

According to well-known adage, chance is always good things. As late as Thursday afternoon, I was fortunate to verify the basis of this maxim not at my expense of course but to my delight. Is that initially my end of the day promised to be difficult given that for professional reasons I had to quit my job to eighteen hours, a situation not too pleasant for a July 1 when the whole world (or almost) discovered with relief goods made from the single session. On the way back, I had the idea of fortuitous turn the radio on a quest unlikely to come across something that can make me forget the horrors of the journey and especially the fatigue of the day. What was my surprise when I plug into RTCI, falling hair cell on the radio program Habib Belaid "Full Course". I do not know if it was a cover (although I strongly suspect it is the case) of past emissions or a new series of "talk culture" that only the great Habib knows secrets. Still, the unexpected joy of finding Habib on the air turned into a euphoric moment to discover the identity of the guest Habib which was neither more nor less than the affable and hilarious Adem Fethi.

What was to be a chore, miraculously transformed into a pleasant stroll. Settled comfortably leading peacefully, I delighted in listening to this interview which is facing two masters who excel in their own way and in its field. Ive watched the debate from beginning to end with the solemnity and respect imposed by its protagonists. Throughout the interview, I tried to imagine the heads Adem and Habib were doing and I envied them both: one as an interviewer for a certain Habib Belaid and the other to have before him a man of toilets, if not the man of letters The most prodigious of the contemporary cultural scene.

to Adem A Habib as they are here to express my gratitude for this moment of pure happiness.