Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Best Color Paint To Go With Travertine

What all this rhyme?

Propriety is that we do not say that the good of our dead. Morality as well. Speaking of dead in recent days, we just lost a political figure who has the discretion of the principal vector of its roadmap. I speak, you've probably guessed, the late Habib Bourguiba Jr. newspapers, as is customary, commented on his departure. Each in its own way of course, although all we did with some taciturnity and a almost laconic tone. Prudence and reserve force would be inclined to say with these times when any reference to the recent past can be an affront to the present.

Except that some newspapers have seen fit to insert in the biographies they dedicated to the deceased and their columns published on a detail to mention the relevance of which still raises some questions. First came the newspaper "As-Sabah" in its edition of yesterday, which hinted slyly. Then came the turn of cloth "Achourouk" to say the most thought possible. Both publications are have investigated the past of Bourguiba Jr. highlighting the fact that he came into the world shortly before his parents' marriage was declared legally. They suggest that a certain illegitimacy and a blemish or stain on the dignity of man. Otherwise, why would they dwell on a detail person who does and who is a retail end. Unless the intent is to make a double shot: slander Bourguiba Jr. (son born out of illegitimate because the legal framework) and at the same time his father (guilty of concubinage) and a little depressing the nail. To those

their feathers that inspired them to lay such a meanness, I would ask them: What more legitimacy can be given to his offspring when he was already bequeathed his personal and family surname? Would not it have been better to ignore the death of this gentleman to persevere in this blind fury and spiteful to deny any gratitude to Bourguiba?

And we dare say that Tunisia is proud of his tunisianité, his homeland and its history. What hypocrisy.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Sample Good Standing Letter

Your mother, the sky and birds

The story I want to tell you happened some time ago of this already. Date there it was beautiful. The sun was shining. Birds chirped. Only a few cars were occasionally break stealth serenity and tranquility in which to bathe the room. Suddenly, from the top of my office is on the first floor, I hear tracks stood. I recognize that curiosity prompted me to go near the window to understand what it was and what were the reasons for all this uproar. Before me stood a crazy scene as incongruous. A 4X4 police had stopped in the middle of the road. His quads door open. A few meters away, stood two uniformed policemen, a police officer in civilian clothes holding his walkie talkie in hand, a curious passer and two college students, a girl and a boy whose age was not to exceed 15 years and with every indication that they belonged the class of local gentry. From what I understand, the police had apprehended in flagrante delicto two teenagers kissing in spirit to a deserted alley, under a tree, believing themselves safe from prying eyes and especially watchful eyes of our dear guards. The chance of these two boys is that the incident of which they are unhappy protagonists took place in a residential neighborhood of the capital where one finds only embassies, residences belonging to ministers or senior officials and some of Administrations. Otherwise, they would forcibly shipped without further ado.

The undercover officer was screaming, bellowing, roaring. He threatened, gesticulated, but dared not go further than a reprimand. He was desperate to have an identity of the girl. She, walled in a deafening silence, fixing a piercing gaze fierce and his "attacker" is denied to comply with the orders of the representative Blocker of the law. The scene lasted more than five minutes without one or the other does not make concessions to each other. Tired, disgusted, I decided to get involved in the situation. I approached the officer and told him:

- Mr. Officer, I think that's enough now. I think you've taught them the lesson they need and will think it twice before venturing to do the same stupid next time.
- Excuse me sir, you want me to learn how to do my job or what?
- Far from my mind Mr. officer. But I can say that help make your job a little more educational. You just fuck one of the best patrols to these two kids. I think the punishment is sufficient. You've shaken enough, they can go now.

At this time, the policeman took me by the hand and walk away a bit from the pack. It kept me pretty much what speech

- Listen sir. I swear I'm not actually doing an excess of zeal. But it turns out that if the girl refuses to obey my orders is my authority that will suffer. If it were up to me, I would have dropped. But you know there are two colleagues with me and the situation is a bit tricky.
- But sir see the agent, you know very well that your authority is and will remain intact. Not even when two kids who are going to shaken.
- Well, do like that then. You ask the kid to give me his ID card and I forgive them in the second that follows.
- Between you sir agent what does this change? It is for you to have the last word? I do not think you put yourself on equal footing with the girl anyway.

The officer remained thoughtful for a moment and then said:

- You see things like that?
- You too I am sure.
- Good kids will go home I do not want to see you here. And beware the next time.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Tiffany Jewellery Font Name

Do not improvise masochist who wants

The Swiss do not want minarets home. And then? Or is the problem? Nowhere, if one assumes that each nation is sovereign and free in his choice. Except for the express, the Swiss have felt a pressing need to say loud and clear. They told the world of the most clear and explicit as possible.

This will have been missed if she had not fallen in the political field. And when it moves into the morass of politics one must know what to expect afterwards. To express that refusal Swiss needed to do through a referendum, making the case a matter of state. Suddenly, he is quite a hype that the issue raised and continues to do so. This applies both inside and outside the borders of countries in the Laughing Cow.

They said therefore that the Swiss are sovereign to make all the decisions they deem best for their country (like the Switzerland of Africa elsewhere). Except that here it is, trying to justify the decision to ban minarets, a good majority of the Swiss saw fit to report that, among other considerations that have led to vote against the presence of forms phalloides home is the lack of reciprocity in Muslim countries.

This argument intrigued me by its incongruity. It betrays an ignorance that grotesque Swiss in particular and Westerners in general have about Muslim countries. Without going into details that I can not prove it by concrete examples, I would point out that, until proven otherwise, Muslim countries are in their overwhelming majority of exporting and importing non-migration. If the Arab and Muslim world need to build churches did not feel it is not (only) because of a reluctance or denial to build temples other than Islam, but simply because these countries have not yet experienced an exodus of people of Christian faith in the image of what happens in European countries that receive them every day thousands of people of Muslim faith and others who express the need to erect temples where they can worship and practice their faith.

Furthermore, this case, by elevating the status of the referendum, and thus committing the will of an entire nation, could turn into an accident that will feel the suffering incessantly. Switzerland, we already know, is not his first political blunder. Recently, the Swiss country has had to be humiliated to the point of lowering his pants to remedy a trivial matter of justice that should have stayed in the lap of the courts. The case in question, which has become a fact of state just because of the involvement of one of Gaddafi's son, had all the chances to resolve without causing waves. But it was not rely on the willingness of some circles to politicize the case. The result is well known. Instead of focusing on the legitimacy of the position of the Swiss justice is a showdown against Gaddafi that Switzerland has preferred afford. Result: Bern has had to resign to formally apologize.

This time with the case of minarets in Switzerland will not only make a fool silly the likes of Gaddafi. The Swiss, consciously or not, opted to lie on his back two forces as formidable one than the other Muslim populations, overly stigmatized and exceeded, and magnates and representatives of sovereign wealth funds, to teach that there are more populist Swiss populist than they, will compete to see who inflict the most degrading humiliation these brainless Helvetas.

The tragedy in all this is that those who will pay the price it will be members of the Muslim community in Swiss land that, paradoxically, is believed to neutral ground.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Wedding Toiletries In Washroom



It seems that the fact that I blog more, and therefore my name (nickname) no longer appears on Tn-blogs, has welcomed some of the heads of Turkish. One two has even taken the trouble to let me know by leaving me a little comment to me how mean he feels relieved to no longer see my blog activity. Well, in reply, I confess that I did not know my writings were so disturbing. I thought I was blogging for my own enjoyment and for those with whom I share some wacky ideas.

I wish I knew before and not now that my blog had more visitors than I suspected. That would give me more punch to write with much more diligence and energy. But, here it is that things go in the opposite direction of my desires. Now that blogging has become a pleasure bitter because of false chamaillades, sanctions more or less serious bloggers who are demoralized, fat idiots who insist on leaving a comment to make even more distressing that their stupidity ... here is some attempt to get me out of my self-imposed slumber. Foolishly, they think they rule me my account when I do not remember having trouble with one of the fuckers shit 'appointed Tn-Blogs.

I have no taste for controversy, much less when they are sterile. I'm not an avid partisan polemicists either. I happened to do battle with some comments that I found very unpleasant. But it does seem to me that the tension has gone beyond the mere misunderstanding.

So? So I am both amazed and intrigued by this challenge and I know neither the author nor the content, although I suspect that the main reason is that I was labeled as belonging to a group whose beliefs and creeds are diametrically opposed to those who believe they have established their stranglehold on Tn-blogs. At these brats, I would tell them they are wrong a lot. As always.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Do British Women Have Big Boobs

And thou shalt make thee to thy children? From



The degree of modernity of a society is measured by the yardstick of freedom granted to its women. This is most obvious thing. What was not clear, for cons, it is from when apply the term "woman" to a female person. 15? 20 years? 25? 30? Who Knows. Why I ask this question might seem silly? Simply to better justify the questions that I had to ask after an enjoyable and painful to the time I experienced recently.

It is in my (bad?) Habits return once a week a friend with whom I share a few beers (5 or less). This summer has been elected as a place of reunion preferred a hotel in the northern suburb famous for its terrace or the breeze never fails and where one could enjoy the panoramic view before our eyes.

As in most hotel room, the hotel bar we decided to attend is distinguished by a consistent female assistance. All did not come to indulge in the pleasures of the unfathomable ale, but a good portion of these ladies came specifically to cool the throat and ideas with one or two mugs, and even more ... I must say that the scene no longer surprises and for a good long time is no longer the only sound that P ... sit down before a Celtia comforts of home waiting for a customer to drop their nets. The good ladies also came out of their "dens" and not hesitate to order more beer and enjoy the most natural. Recently

So with my partner, we headed to our weekly task. When we arrived, there was only one free table. As luck would have put us in front two scenes as improbable as one another.

Act 1:

our left there were a couple. The girl and the boy had to be at large 28 years max. The discussion was a little tense but neither one nor the other has raised his voice more than he should. The girl waved to the server. The server comes with three beers. He filed two before the girl and a boy before. Ten, fifteen minutes after Rebelote three beers, two for a girl for the boy. The ritual was repeated three times and it always gives the same two beers for a girl for the boy. Most surprising in all this is that the boy appeared at the end of alcoholic coma. The girl, she has kept all his sobriety and his dignity.

Act 2:

On our right there were 4 girls aged between 18 and 22 years. The atmosphere was festive. There is room and we laughed without restraint. They drank too. While they exchanged comments about pictures in posing their phones with one hand to another, I watched this "table" with a sense of amazement and satisfaction at a time. Surprised because it did ultimately that of girls. Satisfied because I admire the nerve of these girls. I enjoyed the spontaneity and simplicity with which they performed their act. There was their intention or of provocation or rebellion. They needed to get a "9a3da" between girls and it was done in the most natural.

And then suddenly I remembered that before being a "zabrat" I am a father of a 7 year old daughter. So I asked myself that my reaction will be if one day my own daughter would be in a situation like this? After some time of hesitation and reflection, and being a bit hedonistic, I I am determined that I never would prohibit my children what I would cheerfully.

That would be my final decision. Except that at some point in the evening the discussion in the next table took one look at unpleasant. Our four "merry men" approached the subject of back home. That is we have learned that my friend and I drank the one that was less than that and that would lead, not to fix things, she had to type more than sixty miles to return home (our friends of the evening came from another city Tunis). The idea I did not like at all. I wanted to propose to accompany each one to his home, but I hesitated for several reasons. They are gone and I was like an idiot. I spent one of my worst nights. I told myself that I would like to death while the rest of my life if he came any unhappiness with these girls I've already passed ... Shamefully, I spent the next few days to carefully scrutinize the obituary pages . Now that more than a week to spend on this and that newspapers have not macabre exacerbated my thoughts I feel a little relieved. However, I took a second resolution to leave my children to leave the choice to drink or not, they would do in my presence or instructing me to move. End of story.

Monday, August 3, 2009

What To Write On A Wedding Card Examples

Larvatus Prodeo


- Here comes in the pages of Shock dedicated to his protagonists one of the most mysterious of our history. It is important to understand that the eminence grise of the high castes Alcalde is without a doubt one of the most unfathomable masterpieces of the great political chessboard of Sirte. Incidentally, just knowing that she is the head of the largest fortunes of the continent should be enough to give a glimpse of the influence it can enjoy with others, without even me to go further in the little details that everyone knows of him.

- However, let me warn you against this foolish hope that you could feed in thinking that we are dealing here with a classic stereotype of the rich person whose power has perverted the unlimited right, for it is a point precise, as it contaminates the powerful of any kind, seems to spare the dowager was founded, it is the weakness of those who allow themselves to be possessed by their possessions.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Harold Kumar Escape Guantanamo Bay Party

The wind of revolt in Iran continues


Security forces pursued the protesters and beat them in the street Valiasr. This has not prevented the crowd to return bins for erecting burning barricades.
Photo: AP JPost

Nearly four weeks after the disputed presidential June 12, thousands of supporters of Mir Hossein Moussavi took to the streets of Tehran on Thursday, shouting "Death to the dictator", defying the authorities ''écraser promised to "any attempt to rally.

The governor of the province, Morteza Tamaddon, had vowed to''écraser" those who dare show up, according to the official news agency IRNA. Thursday afternoon, police uniforms and Basij militia were stationed in many intersections along the Rue de la Revolution and around Tehran University neighbor, who were among the places of rendezvous.

That did not stop the crowd to return bins for erecting burning barricades in some places but the police responded violently, with tear gas and batons. Security forces pursued the protesters and beat them in the street Valiasr, the largest north-south avenue in the city, witnesses said on condition of anonymity to protect themselves.

images broadcast by the state channel Press TV show women wearing scarves and young men repulsed, rubbing their eyes damaged by tear gas.

At Tehran University, a cordon of police prevented the crowd from reaching the gates without disperse protesters who shouted "Mir Hossein" or "death to the dictator", according to witnesses, who estimated the group to a thousand people. No arrests or injuries were reported. Residents have welcomed young activists chased.

At night, the "death to the dictator" has been launched from roofs, according to a ritual established by the pro-Mousavi and lasts about half an hour every evening.

These were the first major events for 11 days, but no comparison with the hundreds of thousands of people marched after the presidential election.

The regime had clearly taken a number of other measures to prevent rallies. The SMS service was inoperative on Thursday for the third consecutive day, apparently to block communications between protesters, as the strongest protest.

Authorities also closed the universities and decreed non-working days on Tuesday and Wednesday, citing the thick cloud of dust and pollution that blanketed the capital and other parts of the country. So on Thursday marking the start of the weekend in Iran, many have taken advantage of these vacation days from surprise to find a more enjoyable time.

Calls to demonstrate circulating for several days on the Internet social networking and other sites close to the opposition. The gatherings were to coincide with the anniversary Thursday in an attack on a Basij Tehran University dormitory in which a student was killed during the student protests of 1999. At least

20 demonstrators and seven militiamen were killed Basij in the crackdown that followed and a thousand people arrested. If the policy insures that most have been released, security forces continue to confront dozens of activists, journalists and bloggers. Foreign nationals are not spared, while Tehran accuses Western countries of stirring, even plotting the challenge.

apparent victim of these tensions, the French Reiss remained jailed Thursday in Evin prison, where the ambassador of France was able to visit him in the morning. The young woman of 23 years is " good health "but" concerned "about his fate, according to the head of French diplomacy Bernard Kouchner.

Arrested on 1 July when she was about to return to France, the French girl, reader of French for five months Isfahan, is accused of espionage for passing on the Internet photographs of events, according to French authorities.

Wednesday in L'Aquila (Italy), which holds the G-8, Nicolas Sarkozy had demanded The young woman is released "on the field." These methods are nothing more than blackmail, "ruled the French president.


% 2FJPArticle% 2FShowFull http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443772318&pagename=JFrench

Depilatoriespubic Hair Remover

ARMY OF HAMAS PREPARES



Israeli Press Review Press Service of the Embassy of France in Israel



/ Amit Cohen - Maariv
Who said that Hamas has done nothing to rebuild Gaza after "hard lead"? Since the decree of a cease-fire, the Islamist organization working to rebuild, not destroyed houses and infrastructure failure, but his battery of rockets and military deployment. That is what we Security officials said the Palestinian Authority, under which Hamas would also be modernized and strengthened its communications systems.


It seems that Hamas intends to resume shortly the attacks from the Gaza Strip, a decision taken by the organization's leadership in Damascus after pressure from inside and outside.

Palestinian security officials told the Maariv that at a board meeting Hamas military held this week, chaired by the "Chief of Staff" of Hamas Ahmed Jaabri, it was decided to resume the attacks and gradually make them more violent according to Israeli responses.

First, Hamas would carry out attacks against Israeli forces deployed along the border. If it would lead to an escalation, Hamas should, in a second time, again firing rockets at Israeli towns. (...) /.

What Heat Exchanger Fits Goodman Gmpn080-4

Good news: Bole-Richard Yoram Ettinger

The Amnesty International report could not generate more acerbic comments and unbalanced from the permanent correspondent of the World, the daily Gothic night.

Operation Lead Cast of January 2009 would have killed 1,400 people, a figure drummed at will by any account of what detractors of Israel.

checks made from leaves appear the figure of 750 dead, most of which are "police" the Palestinians. But it is difficult for international organizations to achieve a correct account when making their investigations under the tight control of the Islamists of Hamas.

The figure of 350 civilian deaths can be reduced to 200 if it does not take into account those directly attributable to Hamas (executions summary, revenge and human shields).

240 police officers were killed, the report said. This figure is ridiculously low. Police officer on this term, it suffices to know that this title is given to almost any how, so long as the person is likely to carry a gun.

The "policemen in Gaza" are either members of Hamas, Al Qassam Brigades, and other splinter groups to Islamist ideology. When they

the shot and sending rockets at civilians in Sderot, they are "activists". When they are victims of Israeli response, they are police.

This flexibility in the definition of these characters helps maintain the blur their true motivations. But it is the expected result.

Fools Western, including our journalists only see the fire that left by the bombing.

Jean-Paul Belmont had warned in our columns, and this, from December 28, 2008: "Returning to their eternal rhetoric about the" cycle of violence ", the need for a" just settlement of the conflict " , appeal for calm "two parties", when they will not settle for a conviction Pure and simple to Israel, they will save face and give the impression of working for peace. "(read Operation Lead Cast: before the editorials)

When French soldiers killed in Afghanistan, accusing them Is there not being enough of them to die? Their attributes does one do we the victims of the fanatics they are fighting?

And if an extremist group dare rejoice ambushes in which soldiers fall and calls for the increase, he continued to glorify murder and the Minister of Interior is considering dissolution *.

But when it comes to Israel a different logic starts Instead, reversing the usual values and benchmarks.

Amnesty International has seized on the issue by sending a commission of inquiry, in parallel with that of the UN commission headed by the ineffable Goldstone.

July 2, 2009, Amnesty issued its 117-page report, which calls into question the actions of the IDF, and to a lesser extent, those of Hamas.

This report has the merit to report, albeit timidly, the atrocious practices of the Islamist movement, in frantic search of martyrs to give to the cause.

But there is the report and what journalists do.

The last delivery of Bole-Richard, correspondent of the World, is no exception.

His article is composed of 743 words. Of these 743 words, only 23 are devoted to the activities of Hamas.

Bole-Richard also notes with relish an assertion of false report by Amnesty, that Hamas would not have used human shields. This is in complete contradiction with the testimony of Gazans.

At most, Amnesty accuses Hamas of "installed military positions near houses, thus endangering the lives of civilians." In terms

suitors ... No word on summary executions, assassinations of Fatah members and other developments including Hamas regularly visits guilty since he took power by force and not through the ballot box.

743 words of contempt under the guise of information.

Donatella Roverra, head of Amnesty said that there were virtually no street fighting and that the IDF soldiers sank like butter in Gaza.

How does she know that? The answer is disarmingly she found no bullet casings in the street.

No sleeves? This is important and Bole-Richard fails not to lift it.

For if there was no street fighting between the two opponents, what can we attribute the destruction of many buildings, if not a systematic attempt to destroy the part of Israel?

's a good question to which we can respond in several ways. One can speculate that the brave fighters of Allah chose to flee and do nothing faced.

A mission of inquiry that takes place three months after the fighting does not find a socket in the streets and is surprised. One might reply that, even in Gaza, they have brushes. They even know the places that need cleaning and leave the rubbish where it should when it comes to providing photographers the view.

And the low number of casualties in the IDF alone is proof, according to Amnesty and Bole-Richard.

These two characters have forgotten a constant venomous strategic Israeli army for 60 years of fighting. This country is fighting for its survival.

The army takes the utmost care to protect its soldiers, who are also young people. The greatest precautions are taken to protect the point of having this protection in a battle quasi-science.

normal for a country whose fertility rate is well below that of its neighbors. But this science is not always accurate.

Bole-Richard is one of those people who would like Israel is only a parenthesis in history.

They believe that this country should be allowed to strike without retaliation, he does that happen ...

These people should be accustomed yet. At Drancy, too, there was only passing through.


Pierre Lefebvre © Primo, July 8, 2009 * The

CAPJPO
http://www.primo-europe.org/impression.php?numdoc=Ed-960883592

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Chicago Fashion Internships

can read: "Encourage the emigration of Arabs from Judea and Samaria"



Yoram Ettinger, who has held important positions in the Israeli Embassy in Washington, is now Director of Special Projects at the Centre for Political Research at the University of Ariel ( Samaria). But it is especially the group of US-Israel Demographic Research, and continues to dispute the official statistics published by the Palestinian Authority and the Central Office of Statistics in Israel, which put the figure at about surreal the Palestinian population that lives in Judea and Samaria.

Today he sounded the alarm about the famous "economic peace" that seeks to establish Binyamin Netanyahu, and he said that could "reverse the migratory flow of the Palestinian people." It is recognized that the demographics is a key to the Israeli-Palestinian problem, and is a key element in policy development. Therefore, in the opinion of Yoram Ettinger, "The Palestinians and the Israeli left have always had a tendency to inflate the importance of the Palestinian population to cause panic among the Israeli population and make it easier to accept the idea of an Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria. "

Wednesday held the inter-ministerial meeting to endorse the four major economic zones planned projects in Judea and Samaria, to the benefit of the Palestinians: an industrial zone near Beit Lehem, a major agricultural project near Jericho a business area near the Jordan River and near Jenin.

Ettinger warns Israelis risk that can cause these projects: "We must keep in mind that in the field of demography, migration factor is more important than the birth rate. If these economic projects for the Palestinians emerge, they will attract to Judea and Samaria many Arabs, as was the case at the beginning of Zionism, when the economic boom caused by the Jews here have attracted many Arabs from the Middle East. "

Ettinger is categorical: "If Israel wants to maintain a clear Jewish majority between the Mediterranean and the Jordan, should encourage the emigration of Palestinians to other Arab countries, as is the case, not reverse this trend turning Judea and Samaria in economic paradise for the Palestinians or other Arabs in the region. "

figures to support, Ettinger shows "that every time Israel wanted to improve the economic conditions of Palestinians, the flow of emigration to Jordan was suspended and has instead reversed by the arrival of many Arabs to Judea and Samaria. He says there are external factors that force many Palestinians to want to "look elsewhere": the rise of Hamas, or the rising price of oil, which offers interesting prospects for work in Gulf countries for example .

Other long-term imperative for Israel, according to Yoram Ettinger: "Whatever agreements which could one day be signed between Israel and the Palestinians, Israel must maintain control of crossing points between Judea and Samaria and the Jordan. If ever an Israeli government that ceded control to the PA or even an international body, masses of Palestinians would fall into these areas, not to the outlook that they will provide, but simply because the terrorist organizations would pay very dear each family would move there in order to reverse completely demographic balance in the west of the Jordan, and directly threaten Israel's existence. "


by Shraga Blum
http://www.actu.co.il/2009/07/yoram-ettinger-% c2% ab-encourage-l% e2% 80% 99emigration-the-Arab-de-Judea Samara-% c2% bb /

Fake Community Service For College

construction in Judea and Samaria: always center of the debate







A diplomatic incident seems to have been settled between Israel and the European Union, the latter having apologized Wednesday night after the publication of a statement virulent against the expansion of Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria.

In the message posted earlier this week by Roy Dickinson, a diplomat of the European Commission it was stated that "the policy of settlements strangling the Palestinian economy and kept the Palestinians in a state of dependence vis-à-vis countries donors.

Following these accusations, a senior Foreign Ministry Rafi Barak convened the EU ambassador to Israel Ramiro Cibrian Uzal to express its indignation and say that these allegations were not substantiated.

In addition, Israel's ambassador to Brussels, Ran Curiel, met Wednesday evening a representative of the European Commission Technical Support (ECTAO). It was established that these statements were made without the knowledge of Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Commissioner for External Affairs of the European Union. The Foreign Ministry has finally expressed his satisfaction at the end of this interview, even if we know that Europeans do not approve the expansion of Jewish settlements.

As the United States, tensions persist with Israel after meeting U.S. envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. The spokesman of the Secretary of State Ian Kelly raised the issue again Wednesday night to remember that Israel must "freeze construction in settlements." He added: "Senator Mitchell and the Minister Barak had excellent talks but have not changed our positions."

He continued by saying that both sides must respect their commitments and efforts to foster contacts in order to revive talks for the establishment of a comprehensive peace. That is to say that for Americans, if the Israelis must stop their work in Jewish settlements, Palestinians, meanwhile, must stop the provocations and terrorist acts. And this must be done concurrently with the processes of the Arab countries for a "normalization of ties with Israel."


by Claire Dana-Picard

http://www.actu.co.il/2009/07/la-construction-en-judee-samarie-toujours-au-centre-du-debat/

Sample Lutheran Wedding Program

RELEASE OF BNVCA


The BNVCA praises Police and condemns the attack committed by three young girls described from North Africa, a Jewish girl of 15 years, 07/07/2009 at 12am, pool David D ' Anger Paris 19 °, hospitalized for head trauma.

NATIONAL BUREAU OF VIGILANCE AGAINST ANTI-SEMITISM
Sponsored by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Word and Light, the League, the Union of CCJ IdF
8 Boulevard Saint Simon 93700 Drancy
The President
Sammy GHOZLAN
0609677005

Drancy 07/08/2009

National Bureau of Vigilance Against Antisemitism denounces and condemns the new aggression committed against a Jewish girl of 15, Z. Na, as described by 3 minor of North African origin, in the pool David From Anger to Paris 19th, Tuesday, 07/07/2009 to 12H. In its complaint
collected by police, on his hospital bed, the young Z. Na. Explains that her 3 antagonists have already cloakroom, threatened to attack him after throwing looks arrogant and provocative that it did not repondu.Puis before the basin, one of them has slapped by treating "the kike BIG BIG BIG SLUT WHORE ..." This same girl wheel of punches and kicks, dropped to the ground on his head, causing head trauma and numerous bruises to his face and throughout the body, which leads to his hospitalization at Robert Debré.
We welcome the action of the police, thanks to witnesses including masters swimmers, quickly calls the 3 attackers We ask him to shed light on this affair as much as the young Z. Na ... do not understand the reasons for such violence as she had taken the precaution of no have any distinctive mark this apparent.Et as recommended by parents of Z. Na, like other Jewish parents who are worried about having to take such measures when their children leave or have to attend public places.
We urge the judicial severity and firmness required for such aggression, despite the criminal minority of 3 young forwards. The sanction must really be a deterrent and exemplary for the freedom of coming and going of children and adults French Jews to be exercised safely.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

What To Say On A Certificate

The Pakistani media reported: the rise and fall of the Taliban in Karachi



MEMRI - Middle East Media Research Institute

articles recently published in Pakistani media indicate an increasing concern at the rise of Taliban militants in Karachi, the largest commercial city of Pakistan. According to a report released April 15, 2009 in the Daily Times, based in Lahore, "the Taliban operate in Karachi and secretly extorted millions of rupees in the form of" donations ", members of the Mehsud and Wazir tribes residing in the city. "(1)


" A few months ago, a Taliban representative has raised over two million rupees in few days, "the report said, noting that if some donors are integral with the Taliban, others pay for fear of reprimand.
A report of 30 March 2009 published in Pakistani daily The News, titled "The Rise of the Taliban, the fall of Karachi," said that these militants threaten including women and businessmen of Karachi .

Extracts from the report: (2)

"The next time you go out, cover yourself from head to toe."

"A friend of the family went out of his car to go to the pharmacy in a busy commercial district of Karachi. She wore the shalwar-suit Kamiz classic that most women are outside Karachi. As she approached the store, a man came to her, a pistol in hand.

But rather than steal, he launched a chilling message: 'The next time you go out, cover yourself from head to toe. "

The incident occurred in full view on a busy street Karachi. But nobody seemed to realize what was happening and the man seemed in no hurry or worried ..

can recall other incidents of concern. "

"This time they took the trouble to specify that they not only knew where he lived, but also where he worked, went to what school their children."

"Many businessmen have received calls on their cell phones, people concealing their identity, but confirming the name of the callee. Two days later, they receive a new call. And then another call . It asks the businessman [and sought] to make a donation to the Tehreek-e-Taliban [umbrella organization of Taliban militants].

A businessman has ignored the call, believing in a hoax . But soon we started to call home for a similar purpose. This time, these men took the trouble to specify that they not only knew where the businessman lived, but also where he worked, went to what school their children, and other details.

The man ended up paying. Nobody knows who these people are. Some say they are criminals who pose as Taliban. Who knows? "

" Several families have received such letters and have generally complied. "

" A family of Clifton [the aristocratic district of Clifton] received last month sent a word the father. This word asked to ensure that her daughters - described in the letter in very negative terms - do not leave their homes since they were considered as mild. The letter sum the father to take the necessary measures, otherwise the mosque will be obliged to 'do something'.

The crime of these girls was apparently too frequently they are seen outside their homes and their manner of dress was too Western.

The authors of the threatening letter had even disclosed their identity, claiming to belong to a large mosque.

Family, shaken, did what we asked. Several families have received such letters and have generally complied. Nothing has been done or any questions asked about people in this mosque. Police have classified the case as unimportant. "(3)

" The government of Pakistan People's Party [in reference to MQM] denies the surge in extremist forces in Karachi since he took office. "

"Last year, the mosque has been identified by the MQM (United National Front) when he drew attention to the accelerated Talibanization of Karachi. But the government People's Party of Pakistan [with reference to MQM] denies the surge in extremist forces in Karachi since he took office. Some describe as suspicious motivations MQM. Their agenda is more political. But again, who is right and who is wrong? (4)

We continue to hear stories about the growing influence of such elements. Women who walk around with uncovered heads in public transport have been spat on, sometimes by other women. "

---------------------- --------------------------------------------------

-------- (1) Daily Times, Pakistan, April 15, 2009
(2) The News, Pakistan, March 30, 2009
(3) The mosque is not identified in this report, but is based in Clifton, the posh neighborhood of the city.
(4) The MQM, or Muttahida Qaumi Movement, is the third largest political party of Pakistan, led by Altaf Hussain, leader of Muhajirs - Muslim immigrants from India to Pakistan - based in London.



---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------

Monday, July 6, 2009

How Do You Loop Two Jelly Bracelets

Iran: "Plan B"


Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, before his reelection, when a visit to the Natanz nuclear site. (Reuters)

By Marianne ENAULT
leJDD.fr

According to Israeli media, Israel has asked its allies, the United States in the lead, moving to "Plan B" in the Iranian nuclear issue. Asked on ABC, the U.S. vice president, Joe Biden, said Israel could "decide for himself what is in his interest." Barack Obama is not really of that opinion: it has once again reiterated its intention to negotiate.


"Israel is looking for a 'plan B' if U.S. talks fail and Iran." In its Monday edition, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports Israeli concerns after the disputed re-election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The paper said Israel would have asked his partners - the U.S., of course, but also Germany, France, Russia and Japan - to prepare a "plan B" if the proposed offer of dialogue from Washington to Tehran were to fail. This should, according to the Jewish state, include "crippling sanctions. According to Haaretz, following recent events in Iran, "Israeli intelligence services believe that the chances that dialogue starts are near zero." Remains whether it involves strikes on Iranian territory. The Sunday Times Saudi Arabia would, in this case, given its tacit approval to the Israeli government for an overview of its territory. Israel has denied the report.

On this subject, the vice-president Joe Biden said something ambiguous Sunday on ABC. "Israel can determine by itself is a sovereign nation, which is in its interest and what he decides to do vis-à-vis Iran and anyone else," he declared. "Whether we agree or not. They have the right to do (...) We can not dictate to another sovereign nation what it can do and not do when she decides, if it decides it is threatened in its existence, "he added. Of about Tehran interpreted as a carte blanche to the Israeli army to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, the international community suspects to military purposes." The U.S. and Israel both know the consequences of a wrong decision ", commented the head of the parliamentary committee on national security Broujerd Aladdin, reports the Jerusalem Post. And to promise action" real and decisive "if attack.

Obama still believes in dialogue

Officially, however, the United States still support diplomatic channels to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue. In an interview with The New York Times published Sunday, Barack Obama expressed his determination to complete the negotiations. "We have offered Iran a path to rejoining the international community," he recalls, saying it is still valid despite the crackdown on protesters who disagree with the outcome of the presidential election on June 12 . He added that he expected progress by the end of the year, otherwise it does not exclude "a range of measures" against Tehran.

But according to the daily Haaretz, U.S. negotiators have expressed to Israeli officials in their skepticism about the chances of successful dialogue. Problem for the United States, they can hardly adopt a firmer tone, at least in the short term, the risk that their offer of dialogue with Tehran regarded as never having been serious. Asked on the program Fox News Sunday, the chief of U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, has he considered that the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities could be "extremely disruptive". "It is impossible to predict the consequences," he said, adding however that the military option should not be discounted. For now, the government Ahmadinejad II remained rather quiet about its intentions.

http://www.lejdd.fr/cmc/international/200928/iran-le-plan-bd-israel_226547.html

Wholesale Chicken Wings In Ga

Israel ISRAEL: The Air Force took the lead



A plane of the Israeli Air Force.
Photo: IDF JPost
By JPOST.COM


The Israeli Air Force plans to take part in air exercises in the United States and Europe. Objective: To train its pilots for long flights, the Jerusalem Post has learned Sunday.

Earlier in the day on July 5, the U.S. Vice President Joe Biden gave an interview on the ABC in which he appeared to give Israel the green light for military action to eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat.

Asked whether Washington was blocking the road by military means to the Jewish state if it decides to stop the Iranian nuclear program, Biden said: "The U.S. can not dictate to a foreign nation what to do or not. "

"Israel can decide for himself - [since] it is a sovereign nation - What is in their interest and [choose one] how to act against Iran or any other state, "he said in the interview broadcast Sunday.

According to Vice President, if the Israeli government chooses a course of action different from the current, it is his right to sovereignty to do so. "That is not our decision," Biden stressed.

The government of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, however, said he preferred to see the stop Iran's nuclear program through diplomatic means, but does not rule out military action.

The planes of the Air Force and Israel will participate this year in a joint air exercise with a member state of NATO yet unidentified.

In the month of July, the Air Force of the Jewish state will also send combat aircraft F-16C for an exercise that will take place at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada.

same time, several transport planes of the Israeli Air Force - C-130 Hercules - will compete Rodeo 2009 at McChord Air Force Base in Washington State.

According to Israeli defense officials, these exercises abroad will drive the long-distance maneuvers.


% 2FJPArticle% 2FShowFull http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443729686&pagename=JFrench

The Labeling Of A Ship

No to Sharia in Britain



by Denis MacEoin, editor of Middle East Quarterly, for The Guardian ,

Original title: No to Sharia law in Britain

Translation: Goal-info

Sharia has no place in civilized society. We must ban the Islamic courts and ensure that in this country everyone is subjected to the same legal system.


There are many reasons to disagree with Sharia. In its finished version, it contains many provisions barbarians, irreconcilable with an advanced society: stoning of married persons who have committed adultery, flogging for a relationship between unmarried homosexuals precipitation from roofs or steep hills, amputation of limbs for theft and worse.


But Sharia covers a much wider field. It happens quite naturally from public to private domain, and in this field that are recorded claims to introduce a degree of Sharia law in this country. These demands emanate not only Muslims but also an extraordinarily naive, Archbishop of Canterbury. Sharia deals only marginally with the way a believer prays, fasts, pays the tax of the charity or the pilgrimage practice. For the individual, it lays down obligations and sanctions that affect the depth of life. Here is a simple example. If in a fit of anger a Muslim three times pronounced the formula of divorce, even in the absence of his wife, Islamic law considers that the couple divorced. If he comes to his senses, the Muslim in question can not simply resume his relationship with his wife. For there to remarry, it must wait three months to ensure she is not pregnant. From what she must marry another man and have sex with him. This man must then divorce her (if he decides not to keep). She must then wait another three months here, after which she may marry a second time by her former husband. This revolting practice, known as halal, is a humiliation for the woman. British law would consider it a form of coercion leading to unwanted sex. Is this what the Archbishop calls?


But sharia has already entered the UK by the back door. In October 2008, Bridget Prentice Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of Justice, said that the government "does not fit" to a religious legal system, and he confirmed two new features. First, that the sharia courts would operate under the Arbitration Act 1996, which stipulates that private disputes can be settled by independent arbitration. And secondly that the decisions of Sharia on family issues (which are not covered by arbitration) will have the authority to those of a British court that would "made a public order" expressed in "vocabulary" of a decision of Islamic court. There is now a Muslim Arbitration Tribunal requesting the President of the High Court of Justice to approve a parallel processing of disputes according to Sharia.


The idea that Muslim courts could be empowered to decide questions under the Family Code, unless you find yourself in conflict with British law, is not relevant, mainly because of severe discrimination affecting Muslim women. We have already seen how the Sharia proceeds with women married in some divorce cases. By giving courts operating according to Sharia a semi-official status, we will introduce this type of denaturation.


I could not get information about the actual decisions of these courts, but there are many websites that enact fatwas in response to questions from the faithful. They are probably the kind of significant provisions that courts will adopt in Britain.


If couples do not marry within the British civil law (and I saw a fatwa saying it is not necessary to register the marriage with the authorities UK here), they face serious consequences in case of divorce. Custody of children (which is still imposed on the woman here) for support (the man is not obliged to pay anything except for children here) and this respect the rights of the family home (the wife did not here). During the marriage, a man can force his wife to sex (while the wives do not have a similar right here), a husband may keep his wife at home, if one or other of the two partners here abandons Islam, marriage is null and void. It is considered that it would be a mistake to reject polygamy here. If a woman wants to divorce her husband, she must obtain his permission and approval of a sharia court. A Muslim may not marry non-Muslim here while a Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim if she is Jewish or Christian here. Legal adoption is prohibited, but if a child was adopted, he can not inherit from his adoptive parents here. One of the commands issued by the Islamic Sharia Council in Leyton prohibits a woman from marrying, regardless of age, if not a "guardian" male here by another command, the intention to divorce must come from the man that the divorce is valid here, and another command insists that polygamous marriage should be maintained even in the United Kingdom here, and another provides a man to pay alimony after divorce here .


If the Islamic Courts base their arbitrations on legal provisions as outdated and discriminatory, they condemn British Muslim women to a life of second-class citizens with only a few rights. And if they claim to be confined to giving advice under British law, what law will they actually the priority? The only solution to this situation scandalous is to ban such courts and compel Muslims to observe a single legal code, like everyone in this country. The Sharia courts should be excluded from the Arbitration Act of 1996 that the slogan of justice for all does not turn into a farce.



The report by Denis MacEoin on Sharia in the UK has been published by Civitas June 29, 2009


Denis MacEoin is the new editor of Middle East Quarterly, an international journal dedicated to the study of political of religion and society in modern times in this region

http://www.objectif-info.com/index.php?id=1205

Saturday, July 4, 2009

The Globe Theater Mini Model

"The investigation" concealed from UN on "war crimes" Israeli




By Alan Dershowitz busy, particularly because of recent Israeli military attacks against the occupied Gaza Strip. "

The board of Human Rights of the United Nations is a scandal. It is the successor of the defunct Commission on Human Rights of the UN. Both organizations have a long history of setting aside condemnation of Israel, and willful blindness on those who violate human rights by the worst culprits of the world, many of which dominate the Council for Human Rights, man and his predecessor.

As Anne Bayefsky University of Hudson Institute, has recently noted: ":" The Council has adopted more resolutions condemning Israel and decisions that all other 191 UN member states combined. Council spends more time to demonize Israel, the more likely he will be unable to ever condemn the genocide in Sudan, female slavery in Saudi Arabia, or torture in Egypt. " The same mandate

who authorized the investigation in Gaza reveals his bias against Israel. The Council has already concluded, without any pretense of investigation, that Israel is guilty of "serious violations of human rights, linked to its military attacks. "

He also concluded that the Gaza Strip "is still occupied," even though Israel ended its occupation and withdrew all its soldiers and settlers since 2005. In addition, the current chairman of the board has limited the scope of the investigation to "violations committed in the context of the conflict which took place from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009." These are the dates of the Israeli response to more than seven years of rocket attacks by terrorists operating behind human shields in Gaza, Hamas and its terrorist allies have fired thousands of rockets and mortar shells, wounding and traumatizing for women, men and children in Israel. But these attacks have caused self-defense military actions of Israel, are excluded from the survey, according to mandate and its interpretation by the Council President. It is as if the Council had convened an inquiry into the United States and terrorism, but limited the investigation solely to actions taken after September 12, 2001.

The simple idea of the Council of the UN leading an "independent" or an objective investigation is ludicrous. It is as if a Mississippi Court composed entirely of whites investigating self-defense of a black man, in response to years of lynchings by whites, limiting its inquiry to the events that followed the lynching. There is simply no way for an investigation conducted under the auspices of the Council of Human Rights of the UN, and to remain fair. His history of prejudice should not be legitimized by men and good women who truly care about human rights.

is why it was so surprising and troubling & see a good man like Richard Goldstone to agree to lead the team of investigators appointed by the board of Human Rights of the UN. Goldstone is a South African who fought apartheid and led a major investigation into the causes of violence there, finally criticizing the government itself have established violence through a "third force". Would he have succeeded if his commission had been limited to white members only and if the mandate of his investigation was limited to black violence by excluding white violence which provoked? Would he have agreed to loan the reputation of his name to legitimize the poor narration of the course consisting of only white apartheid? What would it have been "if it was a black lawyer, deliberately selected pat court composed only of whites to play" Uncle Tom "just because he was black?

Goldstone has been selected to head the inquiry precisely because he is Jewish. Do not let up any ambiguity on this cynical reality. I do not blame the board of the UN have selected a Jew to legitimize its investigation concealed upon the Jewish state. But I wonder how a man like that Goldstone was able to allow himself to be manipulated this way. Has not realized how we had played him. How high his reputation is exploited in the interest of intolerance? Oh yes, Goldstone will be "impartial". That is precisely what the Council wants "a condemnation of Israel and the equivalent Hamas acts dissimilar.

Hamas admits and even boasts of having committed numerous war crimes: first, he boasts of having fired rockets at Israeli schoolchildren and derives its first rockets at times when Israeli children or going home from school, he hit several kindergartens, elementary school and during games (fortunately, the children were sent home), he celebrates every civilian death and injury it causes. Shooting at civilians is a war crime.

Then Hamas brags to hide behind human shields, which is also a war crime. A leading legislator from Hamas bragged that Hamas ... "used as human shields women, children, seniors, and the mujahideen, in order to challenge the Zionist bombing machine. As they reported to the Zionist enemy: "We love death as much as you love life. "

Third, since Hamas is the elected government in Gaza, every rocket attack from Gaza is a violation of Article 51 of the UN Charter, which authorizes a member of the United Nations to defend itself against " armed attack. "

Fourthly, these attacks are part of a long-term strategy to destroy a UN member nation, like the Hamas charter states clearly. No "investigation" is needed to conclude that Hamas had committed war crimes.

Israel, on the other hand, is committed in legitimate self-defense: as Richard Kemp, the prominent British expert told the BBC during the war in Gaza: I do not think there was ever a time in the history of war which an army has made greater efforts to reduce civilian casualties and the death of innocent people, that the IDF does today in Gaza. "

Be impartial conduct as against asymmetric, or find a moral equivalence where none exists, this is the worst result of intolerance immoral. Yet a moral and legal equivalence is exactly what this commission investigation "found" after "its mission independent fact-finding" unless it finds that Israel's conduct has been worse than Hamas because more people died under fire that under the Israeli rockets of Hamas. Investigators ignore the law that keeps murderers who hide behind human shields responsible for the deaths of human shields, even if the bullets that killed them were from the weapons of those who engaged in legitimate self-defense.

Consider the analogous situation of the Navy Seals who were killed Somali pirates have kidnapped merchant ship captain Richard Phillips. Such attempts at relief have sometimes resulted in the tragic deaths of the hostages. Would it be fair to go on trial for killing seals, instead of pirates? That is exactly what the Commission Gaza's goal is to Israel. It ignores the fact that Hamas always exaggerates the number of civilians killed in this category including the armed police (who are also terrorists), "civilians" wanting to be human shields or to voluntarily allow their home be used to manufacture, store or fire rockets, "children and women" have become terrorists, and even "collaborators" killed by Hamas.

Goldstone will do its best to be impartial. But he knows that if his report does not condemn Israel at least as strongly condemns Hamas that it will never be accepted by the Council for Human Rights of the UN and its work will be reduced to zero . It is an experienced international diplomat. He knows who appointed him. It includes its mandate. He will try to expand it to include war crimes of Hamas in order to be "impartial," even if Hamas is already boasting of his crimes.

Israel knows it. They know Goldstone. They know that his appointment was calculated to make it difficult for Israel to refuse to cooperate with an investigator Jew who had close ties with the Jewish state. If they refuse to cooperate with this group of eminent investigators, they will be considered by some to fear the "truth." If they cooperated, they know the "truth" produced by this survey will be a lie. They are in a no-win situation, just because Richard Goldstone has accepted an appointment he should never have accepted.

Israel must conduct its own investigation, and let Splash fall where they may.

Richard Goldstone to resign in protest if the Council of Human Rights is a legal or moral equivalence between the numerous war crimes committed deliberately by a terrorist, and unintentional deaths caused by the use of human shields to protect terrorist actions against legitimate self-defense undertaken by a democracy to protect its citizens.


Thursday, July 2, 2009

Washing Machine Masterbation

Science: A Star Wars?

Israel might be losing momentum in its "conquest of space" region. Vigilance is required.
Photo: Bloomberg JPost

Reserve General Haim Eshed is worried. This scientist of 69 years who runs for thirty years the space program within the Department of Defense is concerned that lack of funding necessary, Israel will lose its qualitative edge over other countries in the Middle East, like Iran, are seeking to develop space capabilities.

For now, Israel is leading the pack in this area, but Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other nations in the region are starting to invest unprecedented resources to develop stations launch on their own soil.
"Iran has understood it takes the brainpower to go into space, so it distributes scholarships to its young people to go and study, "Eshed told The Jerusalem Post in an exclusive interview." He knows that advantage that Israel has is its human capital. "

can estimate qu'Eshed part of that capital. Young Colonel in military intelligence, he stressed that Israel must develop capabilities in satellite Following the signing of a peace treaty with Egypt. At the time, Eshed was already a hero in the Israeli army. In 1967, he received Medal of Merit from Chief of Staff for developing a system that was - and remains, 42 years later - top secret.

"I understood that, with peace on our door, we could not fly over the Sinai to gather information and that the only way to know what was happening in the region would monitor it from above , via satellite, "he recalls. So

Head of Research and Development of intelligence, therefore Eshed writes a proposal, which is found in the hands of Defense Minister Ezer Weizman, before landing on the desk of Menachem Begin. It approves funding project in 1980.

"I am convinced that if we have so quickly agreed to withdraw from the Sinai, because we knew we had the ability to manufacture a satellite," he says.

The first Israeli satellite, the Ofek 1, was launched September 19, 1988. With it, Israel entered the exclusive club of nations capable of launching satellites from their soil. The club which now includes the U.S., Russia, France, Japan, China, India and the United Kingdom, has come to see a new member: Iran.

"At first we were very unpopular," says Eshed. "Israel was a tiny country that had just been created and sought to build capacity which had only the two superpowers: the United States and the USSR. "
But that has not stopped Eshed, and during the twenty years after his first step into space, Israel launched fifteen satellites. The last departed from India in June 2008.

Unlike spy satellite Ofek series and Eros, TecSar is one of the few in the world to use radar technology instead of cameras. This enables him to create high-resolution images of terrestrial objects, whatever the weather, even through the roofs of houses, except for concrete structures.

Multipurpose

satellites are used for all sorts of missions: to follow the progress of the Iranian nuclear program, for example, or transmit communications and images to troops operating behind enemy lines, as in Operation Lead Cast in the Gaza Strip. If the information provided by foreign media are correct and that the Israeli army has bombed a convoy of ammunition to Sudan in January, is probably also thanks to satellites, not to mention the bombing in September 2007, facilities Syrian nuclear few weeks prior to their function.

accordance with the Protocol, Eshed refused to specify the exact use of satellites, but expressed a widely extended use in recent years, allowing the army to observe any point on the planet. "If the theater is close to Israel, the planes are sufficient to achieve, but with terrorism, it extends more and more," he says. "Just look at the reports that come from Sudan."

As unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which Israel is a world leader, the country is also considered as one of the most advanced in terms of mini-satellites. Unlike satellites "mammoth" American, which can weigh up to 25 tonnes, the Israeli satellite - developed and manufactured by the Aerospace Industry (IAI) - weigh between 300 and 400 kg. Currently, the IAI is also working on developing nano-satellites, which weigh only a few tens of pounds and will be capable of providing communications services for military operations.

"Smaller is better"

"The world begins to understand that smaller is better", says Eshed. "A big satellite costs a lot of money to develop, launch and maintain. "And to share his new project: the satellites 'dual use', which may belong in part to private investors - Israeli and foreign - and provide services, civilian or military. The MoD already receives images ImageSat International, a global provider of commercial high-resolution images of Earth taken by satellite.

If we now private investors is that the budgets are tight: Eshed has only about 100 million dollars, while the United States, for comparison, investing in each year 50 billion in their space programs. By YAAKOV KATZ


% 2FJPArticle% 2FShowFull http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443704090&pagename=JFrench


French Song On Cartman Joins Nambla

Barack Obama and the four horsemen of the Apocalypse

In Rafah, Hamas militants watching televised speech President Barack Obama prononcéau Cairo, June 4, at the Muslim world. Photo Credits: AP
From Jerusalem to Kabul via Baghdad and Tehran, the U.S. president faces an "arc of crisis" evolving dangerously.

In foreign policy, Barack Obama faces the ride deleterious Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, all from the "arc of crisis" in the Middle East. The first is called Palestine, the second Iraq, Iran's third, fourth Afghanistan. The most powerful man in the world will reach there in the next three years, to stop the four horsemen who, for now, all go in the wrong direction? The task is arduous, but lack of success at least partially, the U.S. president would jeopardize his chances of being reelected in November 2012.
On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which could last sixty years the relations of the West with the Arab-Muslim, Barack Obama faces a double jeopardy did not know that the last Democrat holding the White House, Bill Clinton, the Israeli government's intransigence and lack of an interlocutor able to negotiate behalf of all Palestinians. Since the 2009 elections, the government headquarters in Jerusalem right-most ever recorded in the Jewish state since its founding in 1948. The recent refusal of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to freeze Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank has resulted, on June 25 last, the first diplomatic incident between Israel and the new American administration: George Mitchell U.S. President's Special Representative for the Middle East, abruptly canceled the meeting he was having with Netanyahu in Paris. Contrary to international law the settlements in West Bank (territory occupied by Israel in favor of its military victory in 1967) has taken over the last dozen years, such a magnitude that it threatens the viability of a future Palestinian state ( that would include the West Bank and Gaza, or 22% of the territory of Palestine under the British Mandate).


A division of Jerusalem in the alley near Second

difficulty, negotiators Americans have in front of them Palestinians deeply divided. In 1993, during the Oslo Accords, Yasser Arafat represented the entire Palestinian nation. Today, his successor as head of Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas, represents a movement which was defeated by the Islamist Hamas to free elections only ever known Palestine. Hamas, which still denies the right of Israel to exist (and which, therefore, America refuses to negotiate), holds an iron hand in the Gaza Strip, after having killed or expelled leaders local Fatah. The latter manages somehow the Palestinian cities and towns West Bank. Despite endless efforts, the Egyptian diplomacy has failed to reconcile the Palestinian enemy brothers, so they are a "government" of national unity, with which we could begin to seriously negotiate a solution. It is true that the support Hamas receives from Hezbollah and Iran do not grow especially the Palestinian Islamist movement in temperance.

Former national security adviser under President George Bush Senior, General Brent Scowcroft told Le Figaro his hope that President Obama "would soon assert that the protocol Taba was the solution chosen by America to resolve the conflict. " From January 2001, Israeli-Palestinian talks at Taba (unfulfilled because of electoral defeat of Prime Minister Ehud Barak defeated by Ariel Sharon) had drawn all the cards split between the Jewish state and Palestinian state, including those of Jerusalem, near the alley. Large Israeli settlement blocs were incorporated into the territory of the Jewish state, which reverted to the Palestinian state as many square miles. Smaller settlements located deep in the West Bank were dismantled (Today, this would represent more than 80,000 settlers to be repatriated by force).

If Obama would adopt the reasonable alternative of Taba, Congress let him he exert real pressure on Israel? In 1991, President Bush senior had forced the Israelis to come to the peace conference on the Middle East he had organized in Madrid by threatening to suspend the guarantees attached to the American Israeli loans. He was not reelected next year ...

Second Horseman of the Apocalypse, Iraq. Tuesday, June 30, all U.S. troops pulled out of Iraqi cities, causing the jubilation of the people and the relief of the Pentagon. But during the previous week, a campaign of bombings, mostly perpetrated in Shiite neighborhoods, killing more than 250 victims. Prime Minister Maliki (a Shiite) accused the Sunni extremist groups linked to al-Qaida to try to revive the Sunni-Shiite civil war in the dark years 2006 and 2007. The units of the Iraqi army and police will they show the energy and impartiality necessary to maintain order in Baghdad, Mosul and Kirkuk? Nothing is less certain. So far, they are rather remarkable for their corruption and sectarianism. The fact is that the vast majority of Iraqi Sunnis do not support the idea of being ruled by Shiites. All ingredients that can fuel a recovery in the civil war are still there. We do not see the Saudis stop funding arms purchases by the Sunni militias, Iranian Revolutionary Guards nor suspend their military support to Shiite militias that they are subservient. As for the Kurds, now totally independent, we do not see them peacefully relinquish control of the Kirkuk oilfield. Barack Obama has promised a withdrawal of all troops from Iraq in 2011. What would be the political cost for him to leave behind it a civil war in Iraq and in the process of decomposition, the image of Lebanon the years 1975-1990?

Third Horseman of the Apocalypse, Iran is by far the most dangerous for Obama. The strategists of the White House had absolutely no plans of Ahmadinejad gigantic fraud in the elections of 12 June that the Iranian-American historian Abbas Milani describes as "well-planned coup to give the full power the IRGC, with the backing of aging ayatollahs. " They had not planned to start either the dignity of the Iranian people and the emotion aroused throughout the world by its manifestations. The hardening of the Islamic dictatorship in Iran do not bode well for the dialogue that Washington intended to take from the fall with Tehran on the nuclear issue. Ahmadinejad has already said he was "permanently closed". There is little dictator, shut up in his anti-Western paranoia, reverse its decision.

Increasing trade sanctions? The only additional sanctions even weaken the regime would be an embargo on gasoline. Iran, whose refineries are outdated, imports 40% of fuel it consumes. But the establishment of such international embargo would require a naval blockade of Iran, akin to an act of war. It would require prior approval of the Security Council of the UN. China and Russia, who congratulated Ahmadinejad on his "victory" would oppose it very likely.

Obama, who has no desire to get a third war on our hands, has, indeed, no way to stop Iran's race to nuclear weapons. A group of three general officers, all former heads of Centcom (U.S. central command covering the entire area of the "arc of crisis"), believes that America must prepare for the inevitable prospect of a nuclear Iran. They advocated the negotiation of a great "deal" with the Tehran regime, they do not consider more dangerous than were in their time, Stalin's Russia or Mao's China. In exchange for his admission into the nuclear club, Iran should agree to curb its protected Hezbollah and Hamas to respect the sovereignty of Iraq, to assist NATO in stabilizing Afghanistan. But can we trust Ahmadinejad to consider entering such a contract with him?


From imagination and luck

The situation in Afghanistan, the fourth horseman of the Apocalypse continues to deteriorate. Led by the Taliban, the Pashtun insurgency is at the gates of Kabul. In an attempt to reconcile the "hearts and minds" of the rural population, the Americans have to formally renounce their strategy for the eradication of opium cultivation. Tactically, they have decided to drastically limit their use of air force, responsible for too many blunders. Without fun, they are preparing for re-election of Hamid Karzai, indecisive personality, whose entourage is notoriously corrupt. Like the Soviets in the late 1980s, they keep talking about the necessary "Afghanization" of war, without really believing. In this country organized by tribes and clans, no one has ever been able to build a national army worthy of the name. In Afghanistan, Americans are faced with a contradiction: they would dream to be able to leave quickly, but at the same time, they cling to the classical triptych security, development and governance, which would require decades of presence for any chance of success. The only good news came from Pakistan, whose army, mainly Punjab, seems determined to regain control of the Pashtun tribal areas, which hitherto served as sanctuaries for the Taliban and Afghan their cronies Arab al-Qaida. To achieve

resolve the Afghan conflict to make a "deal" with Iran, reliable, to withdraw from Iraq without leaving chaos to push Israel to make concessions, Obama will have to show imagination exceptional strategic and diplomatic. It will also require, as the generals dear to the heart of Napoleon, very lucky.


Renaud Girard
http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2009/06/30/01003-20090630ARTFIG00631-barack-obama-et-les-quatre-cavaliers-de-l-apocalypse-.php?mode = print


Saturday, June 27, 2009

Sixtyforce Games Pokemon

Elliot: Bush and Sharon had agreed on the natural growth

"Despite denials of the Obama administration, there have been agreements between Israel and the United States about the natural growth in the West Bank, "said Elliot Abrams, former U.S. national security adviser for business in the Middle East and North Africa from the Bush administration. In an article published Thursday in the New York newspaper "Wall Street Journal, Abrams has contradicted statements by the Obama administration, especially those of the Secretary of State. A few weeks ago, Hillary Clinton argued that the current administration had received no previous document testifying to a written or oral agreement between the two countries about the possibility of building in existing settlements in Judea and Samaria to meet the needs of natural growth.

The dispute between Jerusalem and Washington on construction in settlements in Judea and Samaria has not yet been resolved. Even Italy and France have called Netanyahu to freeze all settlement expansion, demands repeated Friday morning by the foreign ministers of the G8 meeting in Trieste, Italy.

Abrams, in his capacity as head of affairs in the Middle East, among others led the negotiations with Israel on the settlements. This is the second time it contradicts public statements by the Obama administration since the emergence of misunderstanding between Washington and Jerusalem.

"Regarding settlements, we had agreed on principles for the continuation of some growth. Ariel Sharon has clearly pointed out in his important speech policy in December 2003 that Israel would honor all its commitments on construction in Judea and Samaria, there is no construction beyond the existing lines, he there be no confiscation of land for construction, there is no benefit urging Israelis to settle in Judea Samaria and there is no construction of new settlements, "said Abrams .

"Sharon did not invent these four principles. They result from discussions with representatives of the U.S. administration to Aqaba in June 2003, "Abrams added, alluding to what Clinton's statement that" by examining the history of the Bush administration, we do not agree applicable to that matter or official or oral. "

"This statement is not correct. Not only are there these agreements, but also the Israeli prime minister has relied on them when it adopted a new policy painful, which caused the fall of his government: the expulsion of Israeli citizens and communities the Gaza Strip and four settlements in Judea and Samaria. "

He added:" Despite what was said by Mrs. Clinton, there was an agreement. Sharon wanted to get out of the cul de sac, withdraw from Gaza and remove settlements.

by Yael Ancri
http://www.actu.co.il/2009/06/elliot-bush-et-sharon-setaient-mis-daccord-au-sujet-de-la-croissance-naturelle/


Friday, June 26, 2009

Nadine Jansen & Bettie Ballhaus Vox Clips 1

The freedom of the Iranian people



With very few exceptions, the comments of the mainstream press about the events that followed the Iranian presidential election were in the West of shyness.

What happens is nevertheless of considerable importance. Whatever the future, the system established by Ayatollah Khomeini thirty years ago lived. Khamenei and Ahmadinejad Or drown the rebellion in a bloodbath and they will show a somewhat more adult for what they are, dictators and unscrupulous fanatical murderers. Or the revolt and overwhelm the regime change takes place.
While wishing, of course, the second issue, I fear the former. But even this would be the first to occur, it would become much more difficult for a diplomat or a Western politician to pretend that we can still negotiate anything with such people and it would not close their eyes more the dangers that nuclear weapons in the hands of such characters might represent.

What happens now is a lesson in dignity and ethics against the "pragmatism" of those who do stop saying that the Muslim people can not aspire to freedom. The Iranian people today, right now, demonstrated immense courage and expresses that thirty years is enough. Those listening to the chants in the streets of Tehran and all major cities across the country know what is meant is not a request for a recount of votes, but, more often, cries say: "Death to tyrants" or "Death to dictators."

calls are made towards Mousavi, but it is carried by a movement that goes far beyond which there is nothing in the organizer. It may be his leader, but only on condition that he put himself listening to the people.
We also hear, amid shouts, "Allah is greatest", but no better than Ahmadinejad or Khamenei does this mean, that neither Ahmadinejad nor Khamenei, some dignitary or Islamic, is legitimate.

Among the Iranians who are in the streets today, many people have passed through Iraq and saw what no one spoke in Europe: a country freed from a tyrant who was tried and executed, a countries where the press and elections are free. In the demonstrations in Iran, the reference in Iraq is clear. The protesters believe that the fate of Saddam Hussein should wait Khamenei and Ahmadinejad.

The destabilization of the autocratic order that prevailed in the Muslim world and thought that George Walker Bush has effect. Those who think that free elections in Muslim lands are still in power of the Islamists should examine more closely the results of the recent Iraqi elections, the Lebanese elections which saw a net decline of Hezbollah, or elections in Kuwait.

Nobody emphasize the blindness and cowardice, cynicism and lack of perspective Obama administration. Two weeks ago, Barack Obama, in his speech in Cairo was courting the Islamists and licked the feet of Khamenei and Ahmadinejad. For more than eight days of riots in Iran, he chose the camp of those in power and repression in the name of "stability", and eventually hold about minimalist vaguely favorable to liberty.

I remember the time when the United States were at the outset of the side of freedom against totalitarianism. This was the case under Presidents Kennedy left such, preservatives such as Reagan or George Walker Bush. Obama embodies an American left that is nothing left once idealistic, but a far left, radical Third World, opened to Islam, holding hands with dictators.
There are people that Obama still dreaming. It was the dreams we can. I prefer to hope for freedom of Iranian people.
I wrote a year ago that even if elected, Obama would not be President, I persist and I sign. No, Obama does not behave as President of the United States!


Guy Milliere Truths for 4 weekly


Thursday, June 25, 2009

Monster Energy Belly Button Piercings

Lieberman rejects Syrian proposal

By Agency Chinese official press, the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Avigdor Lieberman, has refused a new proposal for Syria that would have hoped to revive peace talks with Israel.

This offer of talks was sent Wednesday by the Dutch foreign minister, Maxime Verhagen, who is currently undertaking a three-day visit to Israel. He reportedly expressed projects Damascus to Lieberman in an interview, but he would have rejected this initiative.
We knew, for the information published by foreign news these days, that during his visit to Damascus, Verhagen had received a message from the Syrians to the attention of Israeli leaders.

For his part, Lieberman confirmed that he had refused the new Syrian initiative and did not wish to resume talks in the current context. He said that the new proposal which had been made through the Dutch foreign minister Verhagen carried certain preconditions which do not meet, which explains his refusal to accept it. Lieberman said he still was willing to open direct talks with Syria at present, provided that there is no middleman and no precondition.

In the media, it was indicated in recent days that Verhagen had received during his visit to Damascus, the messages he had been instructed to convey to the Israelis and should also communicate to the Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. The Dutch minister had even stated that "despite the diplomatic freeze with the Palestinians, another opportunity presented itself now that we should not miss."


by Claire Dana-Picard

http://www.actu.co.il/2009/06/lieberman-repousse-une-proposition-syrienne/