Sixtyforce Games Pokemon

Elliot: Bush and Sharon had agreed on the natural growth

"Despite denials of the Obama administration, there have been agreements between Israel and the United States about the natural growth in the West Bank, "said Elliot Abrams, former U.S. national security adviser for business in the Middle East and North Africa from the Bush administration. In an article published Thursday in the New York newspaper "Wall Street Journal, Abrams has contradicted statements by the Obama administration, especially those of the Secretary of State. A few weeks ago, Hillary Clinton argued that the current administration had received no previous document testifying to a written or oral agreement between the two countries about the possibility of building in existing settlements in Judea and Samaria to meet the needs of natural growth.

The dispute between Jerusalem and Washington on construction in settlements in Judea and Samaria has not yet been resolved. Even Italy and France have called Netanyahu to freeze all settlement expansion, demands repeated Friday morning by the foreign ministers of the G8 meeting in Trieste, Italy.

Abrams, in his capacity as head of affairs in the Middle East, among others led the negotiations with Israel on the settlements. This is the second time it contradicts public statements by the Obama administration since the emergence of misunderstanding between Washington and Jerusalem.

"Regarding settlements, we had agreed on principles for the continuation of some growth. Ariel Sharon has clearly pointed out in his important speech policy in December 2003 that Israel would honor all its commitments on construction in Judea and Samaria, there is no construction beyond the existing lines, he there be no confiscation of land for construction, there is no benefit urging Israelis to settle in Judea Samaria and there is no construction of new settlements, "said Abrams .

"Sharon did not invent these four principles. They result from discussions with representatives of the U.S. administration to Aqaba in June 2003, "Abrams added, alluding to what Clinton's statement that" by examining the history of the Bush administration, we do not agree applicable to that matter or official or oral. "

"This statement is not correct. Not only are there these agreements, but also the Israeli prime minister has relied on them when it adopted a new policy painful, which caused the fall of his government: the expulsion of Israeli citizens and communities the Gaza Strip and four settlements in Judea and Samaria. "

He added:" Despite what was said by Mrs. Clinton, there was an agreement. Sharon wanted to get out of the cul de sac, withdraw from Gaza and remove settlements.

by Yael Ancri
http://www.actu.co.il/2009/06/elliot-bush-et-sharon-setaient-mis-daccord-au-sujet-de-la-croissance-naturelle/

Nadine Jansen & Bettie Ballhaus Vox Clips 1

The freedom of the Iranian people

With very few exceptions, the comments of the mainstream press about the events that followed the Iranian presidential election were in the West of shyness.

What happens is nevertheless of considerable importance. Whatever the future, the system established by Ayatollah Khomeini thirty years ago lived. Khamenei and Ahmadinejad Or drown the rebellion in a bloodbath and they will show a somewhat more adult for what they are, dictators and unscrupulous fanatical murderers. Or the revolt and overwhelm the regime change takes place.
While wishing, of course, the second issue, I fear the former. But even this would be the first to occur, it would become much more difficult for a diplomat or a Western politician to pretend that we can still negotiate anything with such people and it would not close their eyes more the dangers that nuclear weapons in the hands of such characters might represent.

What happens now is a lesson in dignity and ethics against the "pragmatism" of those who do stop saying that the Muslim people can not aspire to freedom. The Iranian people today, right now, demonstrated immense courage and expresses that thirty years is enough. Those listening to the chants in the streets of Tehran and all major cities across the country know what is meant is not a request for a recount of votes, but, more often, cries say: "Death to tyrants" or "Death to dictators."

calls are made towards Mousavi, but it is carried by a movement that goes far beyond which there is nothing in the organizer. It may be his leader, but only on condition that he put himself listening to the people.
We also hear, amid shouts, "Allah is greatest", but no better than Ahmadinejad or Khamenei does this mean, that neither Ahmadinejad nor Khamenei, some dignitary or Islamic, is legitimate.

Among the Iranians who are in the streets today, many people have passed through Iraq and saw what no one spoke in Europe: a country freed from a tyrant who was tried and executed, a countries where the press and elections are free. In the demonstrations in Iran, the reference in Iraq is clear. The protesters believe that the fate of Saddam Hussein should wait Khamenei and Ahmadinejad.

The destabilization of the autocratic order that prevailed in the Muslim world and thought that George Walker Bush has effect. Those who think that free elections in Muslim lands are still in power of the Islamists should examine more closely the results of the recent Iraqi elections, the Lebanese elections which saw a net decline of Hezbollah, or elections in Kuwait.

Nobody emphasize the blindness and cowardice, cynicism and lack of perspective Obama administration. Two weeks ago, Barack Obama, in his speech in Cairo was courting the Islamists and licked the feet of Khamenei and Ahmadinejad. For more than eight days of riots in Iran, he chose the camp of those in power and repression in the name of "stability", and eventually hold about minimalist vaguely favorable to liberty.

I remember the time when the United States were at the outset of the side of freedom against totalitarianism. This was the case under Presidents Kennedy left such, preservatives such as Reagan or George Walker Bush. Obama embodies an American left that is nothing left once idealistic, but a far left, radical Third World, opened to Islam, holding hands with dictators.
There are people that Obama still dreaming. It was the dreams we can. I prefer to hope for freedom of Iranian people.
I wrote a year ago that even if elected, Obama would not be President, I persist and I sign. No, Obama does not behave as President of the United States!


Guy Milliere Truths for 4 weekly

Monster Energy Belly Button Piercings

Lieberman rejects Syrian proposal

By Agency Chinese official press, the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Avigdor Lieberman, has refused a new proposal for Syria that would have hoped to revive peace talks with Israel.

This offer of talks was sent Wednesday by the Dutch foreign minister, Maxime Verhagen, who is currently undertaking a three-day visit to Israel. He reportedly expressed projects Damascus to Lieberman in an interview, but he would have rejected this initiative.
We knew, for the information published by foreign news these days, that during his visit to Damascus, Verhagen had received a message from the Syrians to the attention of Israeli leaders.

For his part, Lieberman confirmed that he had refused the new Syrian initiative and did not wish to resume talks in the current context. He said that the new proposal which had been made through the Dutch foreign minister Verhagen carried certain preconditions which do not meet, which explains his refusal to accept it. Lieberman said he still was willing to open direct talks with Syria at present, provided that there is no middleman and no precondition.

In the media, it was indicated in recent days that Verhagen had received during his visit to Damascus, the messages he had been instructed to convey to the Israelis and should also communicate to the Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. The Dutch minister had even stated that "despite the diplomatic freeze with the Palestinians, another opportunity presented itself now that we should not miss."


by Claire Dana-Picard
http://www.actu.co.il/2009/06/lieberman-repousse-une-proposition-syrienne/

Mw2 Localized.text English

Jewish Humor: Jewish event for Iranian insurgents

Jewish Humor: Jewish event for Iranian insurgents

I do not understand the appeal Jew attached to demonstrate in favor of Iranian insurgents. Is it a hoax? The Iranian people as a whole as well as anti-Israeli Islamist its mullahs. Insurgents pro-Mussavi screaming in the streets of Tehran "Allah Hua Kbar" and Jewish organizations will march today, Sunday, June 21, 2009 in their favor? It
Jews to tear our hair on the head! And in addition, are asked to demonstrate to these brainless who say themselves as pro-Palestinian Marek Halter SOS Racisme and the movement-UEJF? Re-read the excellent book by Professor Shmuel Trigano "The future of Jews in France" to take note of what the Jews Rastignac budding UEJF asserting "Zionist and pro-Palestinian" have caused such damage to the Community France's Jewish and support Israel by providing leverage for companies handling the socialist government during the presidency of François Mitterrand.

After the massacre of students in the Mercaz Harav yeshiva in early March 2008, these organizations not only have not started but have not called to join the demonstration that followed Jewish to Republic. But to demonstrate for the rights of Iranian Islamist protesters, not even in 24 hours they are there to play the beautiful souls falsely humanists in the streets of Paris!

must for even a tiny bit more discerning Jewish to know what to mobilize. It's like in the 60 United States and France, Jews were mobilized then for any kind of event, for Mozambique to South Africa for the pygmies, but little or little to the causes Jewish.

In American Jewish circles, we mobilized the civil rights of blacks. Two young Jewish activists, Shwerner and Goodman, and a young black party in a crossing in the south to protest against segregation were murdered in Mississippi in 1964 by members of the Ku Klux Klan. This story was immortalized in the famed Alan Parker film "Mississippi Burning."

In 1960, Jewish organizations in France were deeply moved and mobilized for the Belgian Congo and the Congolese leader Patrice Lumumba assassinated. Meanwhile, the USSR and the Arab countries, Jews were oppressed, and it took until only the end of the 60s for the world Jewry deign to mobilize large numbers and to alert world public opinion in their favor. Until 1969, Jewish protests to the Eastern Jews were undervalued.

Before then, Jewish protesters were too busy to protest against colonialism, for the FLN, the Viet Cong, or for Biaffra for Indians in the Amazon. The Jews of Eastern Europe or Syria who languished and were allowed to live their Judaism or make aliyah could wait their Jewish brethren in the West well lit and all ready to fight for all the deprived please do effort to remember them.

personality who called him to order the world Jewry and organizations American Jewish brothers for Soviet Jews and Arab countries was the late Rabbi Meir Kahane. Whatever one thinks of the controversial political career of Rabbi Meir Kahane, there is a fundamental Jewish obligation to honor him and to mention his action which triggered the United States, France and in all the diasporas then the unashamedly Jewish activism for Jewish causes, starting with the struggle for Soviet Jewry.

Iran threatens Israel with annihilation for ages and is about to gain access to nuclear weapons. Threatening letters sent to Jewish Iranian diplomats, one does not seen. Massive protests against surging Jewish Iranian in Western capitals, we have not seen much as it was entitled to expect, aside from the buffoonery friendly in Geneva during the Iranian president's speech.

But now, some pro-Iranian insurgents are Mussavi Dung in the streets of Tehran as they chanted "Allah Hua Kbar" and now our rabbis-des-bois Jews agitated, human rights and oppressed freedom for the Iranian Islamists to be represented in proportion to their number of voters. It's enough to cry or rather to hilarious.

That Jewish humor!


Meir Ben-Hayoun

Disneyland Bracelets Real Leather?

In Cairo, Obama spoke in an Islamic militant

by Elisseievna Lay Response to No. 94


Obama's speech in Cairo on June 4 could have been that of a conscious U.S. President promote peace with the Muslim world. Now Obama has a speech in Cairo Muslim, a Muslim activist. Obama throughout his speech advocating Islam in theory and history, including the Islamic vision of gender equality, while he does not hesitate to make remarks insulting to Christians and Jews to slander. He announced the crackdown in favor of Islam, that is to say under the Sharia, which condemns those who oppose the jihad. It contains requirements threatening Jewish sovereignty in Israel, sovereignty unthinkable in Islam.

A - Obama and the Koran


Obama welcomes first to be received at Al-Azhar University of Cairo, as if instead of a U.S. president was in these two places teaching of Islamic law and jihad.


1 - Sura 9


Obama starts his speech by saying he is looking at Cairo a "new beginning between the U.S. and the Muslim world" and he came to tell the truth. They wore a "vow of peace Muslim communities in my country, assalaamu alaykum." Yet in support of this assertion, he makes a quotation from Sura ... the most warlike of the Koran, "Repentance", which contains the verse says "the sword" (9.5), a quotation which he gives a translation ... false.


Obama said, "As the Holy Qur'an" Be conscious of God and always tell the truth. " In reality, the phrase means " Believe in God and be with the truthful, fair, "the latter being those who make war with Muhammad, and were harsh with the disbelievers, instead of fleeing the fighting.


The passage cited (9119 or 9120) in translating Kasimirski: 20


112. God has purchased of the believers their persons and their property so that he gave them back the paradise they fight in the cause of Allah, they will kill and be killed. God's promise is true: he has made in the Pentateuch in the Gospel, the Koran, and who is truer to his covenant than God? Rejoice in the pact that you contracted, it is a joy unspeakable. (...)


118. God returned (...) as all three of them who had remained behind. Any large it is, the earth became narrow for them: their own body seemed too cramped, and they thought to escape the wrath of God, they only had to seek refuge in him . He returned to them, that they also revinssent him, for God loves to come back, and he is merciful.


120. 0 believers! Fear God and be with the righteous.


121. Why were the people Medina and the surrounding Arab nomads to separate from the Apostle of God, and prefer their lives to hers? Why did they have to do so when neither thirst nor fatigue, nor the need could not reach them in the path of God, when they were unable to irritate any infidels, when they don ' wiped from the enemy any damage without being heeded in? Truly God leaves to perish the reward of those who do good.


122. They will not be small or large charity and they will not cross a river without everything being recorded, so that God grants them the most wonderful reward for their actions.


123. It is not necessary that all believers walk to both the war. Why not walk it not rather a detachment from each tribe, so that, educating themselves in faith, one can instruct their countrymen on their return, and so that they know how to protect themselves?


124. 0 believers! Fight the unbelievers who are around you, they'll always find them severely. Know that God is with those who fear him.


Arabic text and transliteration:


http://transliteration.org/quran/WebSite_CD/MixFrench/Fram2E.htm


Ya 'Al-ayyuha Ladhina' Amanu Attaq B Allaha Kunu Wa Ma `a As-Siddiqin


[9119] ye who believe! Fear Allah and be with the truthful.


2 - Sura 5


Obama further explained that Islam is peace, saying: "The Holy Koran teaches that anyone who kills an innocent, it's as if he killed humanity, and whoever saves a person, as if he saved humanity. "


Alas, again, the text means exactly the opposite direction that Obama wants us to believe, and we see a first pass Islamic attitude of denial of the existence of other serious denial because it is a first step toward the attempted extermination of the other. Obama uses the same text that used by UOIF in his "fatwa" during the 2005 riots in France, pretending to condemn the rioters "sowers of disorder, while the Qur'an does not designate as guilty ... Jews.


The Koranic citation is indeed plagiarism and distortion of the Talmud, what Obama, takes care to mention. According to the Talmud, "He that saves a life saves humanity, and whoever takes a life, it's as if he killed the whole world. "(Treatise Sanhedrin 37), because:" Mishna Sanhedrin, 4, 5. In criminal cases, it frightened the witnesses [...] reminding them that unlike civil cases where the accused had to pay damages for forgiveness, the blood of the executed person, and that of his descendants until the last generation, would be "attached" to the head of his execution, as is found in the case of Cain who murdered his brother (Genesis 4:10): "voice of bloods (DMY, Demey) your brother etc.. "Blood and blood descendants. (According to others, "bloods" is plural, because his blood was scattered on the trees and stones). This is why man was created only in order to teach that he who destroys a life is as if he destroys the world, and he who saves one life is as if he had saved the world.


And also for peace among the creatures, so we do not say: 'My father was bigger than yours', and also so that the minimum does not say that there are several creators in heaven , And also to proclaim the glory of the Holy One, blessed be He, because while the man strikes many parts of the seal and all are alike, the King of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, has marked on each the seal of the first man Adam, and yet there is none like his neighbor. Thus one can say: The world was created for me, so I must be right, just [...] (Translation "'Inyan).




For its part, the Qur'an states (translation Kasimirski), Sura 5: 30. Tell them the true story of those son of Adam, who presented their offerings. The offering of the one was accepted, that the other was rejected. He tells his brother: I'll kill you. God, "replied the other, receives offerings that men who fear him. (...)

33. Passion subdued the unjust; he killed his brother, and was among the unfortunate.


35. That's why we gave this commandment to the children of Israel: Whoever kills a man without the latter has committed a 0meurtre = 2, or exercised the robberies in the country, will be regarded as the murderer of mankind; and he who has given life to a man will be looked as if he had given life to all mankind.


36. Our correspondents have appeared in their midst along with clear signs, but despite the signs, most men have been dishonest.


37. This shall be the reward of those who fight God and His Apostle, and employ all their forces to commit acts of disorder on the earth: you put them to death or you'll suffer the torment of the cross, you will cut their hands and alternating feet and will be driven from their country. The ignominy will cover them in this world, and a cruel punishment in the other.


38. Except those who repented before you have conquered because Allah is forgiving and merciful.


39. 0 believers! Fear God: try to win access to him fighting for his religion, and you'll be happy.


But who are the "sowers of corruption" that can kill them because they are guilty? ; Following Sura 5 indicates:


56. 0 believers! Take no friends to Jews and Christians, they are friends of each other. One who will eventually take their friend to look like, and God will guide the development of perverse.


69. Hands of God are related, say the Jews. Their hands were bound to their neck, they are cursed to price their blasphemies. Nearby, in God's hands are open and he distributes his gifts as he wishes, and the gift that God has sent down from on high will only increase their rebellion and infidelity. But we threw among them enmity and hatred, which will last till the Day of Resurrection. Every time they kindle the fire of war, God will turn off. They roam the land to destroy and to commit disorders. May God loves not those who cause corruption.

The UOIF
November 6, 2005 wrote: "In several verses of the Holy Qur'an, Allah blames the destruction and disorder and rejects those who do. He says in verse 64 of Sura 5, "Allah loveth not those who create disorder" he said in verse 60 of Sura 2, "Do not sow disorder on the earth like mischief." (See also 2 / 27, 2 / 205, 7 / 56, 28/77 etc.).. (...) With the increase and severity of events that shake several neighborhoods in the suburbs of Paris ... 'Dar el Fatwa' enacts the following Fatwa. "It is forbidden for any Muslim seeking satisfaction and grace to participate in any action that strikes blindly and private or public property or can attempt on the life of others (...) "


3 - Surah 17


Obama, addressing specific problems, proposes a peace between Israelis and Palestinians. In this connection he quotes: "The story of Israel when Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them) have joined in prayer. "


Obama could have been content to speak of fraternity or sorority even human beings among themselves, but no, he appealed to the Koran, Koranic vision of brotherhood, a rather limited if one refers to the last Surah 49, he will mention. We also note that it obeys the rule to follow the Muslim name of Muhammad with a blessing, so, it extends this blessing to Moses and Jesus, who, moreover according to Islam ... Muslims :: here again Obama takes the attitude of Muslim denial of the existence of the other.


Sura 17 "Al Isra" The Night Journey "said


1. Praise to that transported during the night, his servant from the sacred temple the temple of Mecca from Jerusalem, which we have blessed the precincts to show him our wonder. God hears and sees everything.


curious way of talking about peace by talking about the movement of Muhammad from Mecca to Jerusalem, where Muslims are successors of Muhammad from Mecca to Jerusalem as conquerors.


4 - Surah 49


Obama finished his speech by saying "The world's peoples can live in peace," he prefaced those words by three quotations as if he put on a par three religions: "The Holy Quran says "O mankind! You were created men and women, we have gathered into nations and tribes that ye may know each other. " The Talmud says "The entire Torah is to peace. The Holy Bible says "Blessed are the men of peace, they shall be called the son of God"


Presenting the Talmud as if "the Book" of the Jews while the Qur'an is that Muslims and the Christian Bible, is the thesis of the Koran that Jews and Christians have falsified the book that was given to them and produced fake, for example the Jewish Talmud (while for Jews the Bible is the Bible ... and not the Talmud).


Read only the quote made by Obama, one would think that the Qur'an also "seeks peace." Now peace and brotherhood, Sura 49, Sura 5 as (according to verse 56 Kasimirski) have a design for the least surprising:


10. Because all believers are brothers so arrange the dispute to your fathers, and fear God, have mercy on you.


15. True believers are those who believe in God and His Apostle, and no longer doubt that fight for their goods and their persons in the path of God. Those alone are sincere in their words.


15. True believers are those who believe in God and His Apostle, and no longer doubt that fight for their goods and their persons in the path of God. Those alone are sincere in their words. Thus, the fraternity is limited to believers of the Koran and the call to peace is by war .... According to Islam because peace is allowed only when the Islamic law will rule the world: see for example the passages quoted above from Sura 9 condemning those who refuse to fight.


Conclusion: It is hard to believe, given the choice of suras made by Obama, it does not take a double language: one, apparent, the attention of Western ignorance of Islamic texts, and the other for the attention of Muslims, based on their Islamic credentials. This suspicion is strengthened by reading his comments on the story.


B - Obama and history


Obama's speech multiple historical distortions, always to the glory of Islam. It would take too long to refute them all but here are the key.


A passage from the speech is almost of farce: "Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." Obama added: "We see this in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. "


Say there's a slight difference here in the chronology: the occupation of Spain by Muslims having expanded from 712 to 1492, the Caliphate of Cordoba from 929 to 1031, the Inquisition was established in 1231, and was introduced in Spain in 1478, also for reasons related to the Reconquista, that is to say, the liberation from the yoke of Islamic Spain, which only the last expulsion of Muslims may terminate in 1492.


Obama speaks of "co-existence but also for centuries of wars between West and Muslims, "and" tensions created by recent colonization. "


can note here a slight oversight on his part regarding the causes of the Crusades and colonialism: imperialism dazzling of Islam, which reached Poitiers, invaded Jerusalem, sacked Rome (846), pirate fleets from the western shores of the southern Mediterranean ... According to Obama, it is Islam that has "brought the light of education for many centuries, paving the way for the Renaissance and Enlightenment."


It is certain that the burning of the library Alexandria has strongly contributed to the preservation of ancient texts ... As explained in 1994, Jacqueline de Romilly: http://lumiere101.com/2009/02/02/heritage-greco-latin/: "The Greek texts are income West by Constantinople. If we only had what the Arabs have kept it does not deserve to keep classes! Is insignificant next to the Latin transmission first, and then direct, and then by the papyri of Egypt. "


The talk about Israel, that take the Islamic view of the conflict, are particularly odious. Obama for the "Palestinians" are "Christians and Muslims, "as if Jews had not always lived in Israel, majorities in major cities. Obama dares to compare the situation of "Palestinians" and South Africa, resuming the idea of Zionism-racism, daughter of the charge of Judaism itself as racism. Obama to Israel's creation was due to persecution in Europe, as if Jews were not persecuted in the Muslim world, like for example the residents of Hebron were not victims of a pogrom in 1927 . These are Yemenite Jews who settled on land at stony Gush Etzion in 1926 (here).


And Obama dares to speak of "colonization" to lands west of the Jordan? After which Obama will go to Buchenwald, he who practice denial of persecution and massacres committed against the "Sephardic" by Muslims, to denounce Nazism and denial of Nazism, the two Western sins ....


is how Elena Bonner describes the solution he proposes: "Thus created alongside Israel, and there would be a Palestinian state" cleansed "of Jews, because in addition to demand the return of refugees Palestinian in Israel, there are also calls for "clean" Judea and Samaria [their] Jews and it makes it to the Palestinians, while in Gaza today, there is now a more single Jew. The result is both strange and terrifying, because Israel will truly be destroyed. (...) The formula "two states for two peoples" is the creation of a state, ethnically cleansed of Jews and a second state, a potential candidate to the same cleaning. Judenfrei a Holy Land - the dream of Adolf Hitler! - Becomes irresistible. So - as those who are still able to think do so - what is the party that bears the seeds of fascism today? "(Elena Bonner Jerusalem Post, May 24, 2009)


What Obama forgets fundamentally in its description of history, what are the laws of Islam: the struggle to impose the laws of Islam that justify imperialism Muslim "racism of dhimmitude - based on Shariah law dictates that Christians and Jews are [citizens] of inferior quality and should be removed. "(Wafa Sultan (http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/06/who-should-we-believe.php), who leads by example, the Palestinian Arab street to parade in 1920 the cries of al-yahudna kalabna "The Jews are our dogs" (Nathan Weinstock-Dog History - editions Thousand and One Nights).


When Obama says "America is not - and never will be - at war with Islam" is the denial of the ideology of jihad that practice: it is Islam war with any state that refuses to submit to Islam, or Islam is more ...


C - When Obama said he would enforce Sharia


In addition to the case of Israel where Obama clearly chose an alternative to to restore the Islamic sovereignty, he announced three measures for the implementation of Sharia


punishment of those who oppose the headscarf: "The U.S. government went to court to protect the rights of women and girls wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny. "
the fight against" stereotypes about Islam ":" I consider it my responsibility as President of the USA to fight against negative stereotypes about Islam every time they appear, "which joined the States' requests Islamic repression of "defamation of Islam, "according to sharia criminal defamation,
changing U.S. law to allow Muslims to pay taxes in Islam:" In the U.S. laws on charitable donations make it difficult for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligations . I am working with American Muslims for them to perform zakat. "
Obama has exactly the Muslim point of view when he says" I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I think that Women who are denied education is denied equality. "And" It is important that Western states to avoid impeding the Muslims to apply their religion, for example by dictating the clothes that a Muslim woman has to choose. "


is exactly the rhetoric of Islamic books, claiming that women are unequal to men, even if the Koran command to hit them in case of disobedience and can marry four, since they enjoy an education ... which is not indeed forbidden by the Koran, at least until this teaching does not criticize the Koran and its unequal laws. Obama also takes the concept of "dictatorship", dear to activists for pro-Sharia states that all non-Sharia are dictatorships.


Obama applies here, fighting against those who oppose the veil, the precepts of Abd al-Wahhab Khallaf: "To preserve and protect the religion of any attack, God has prescribed jihad against those who oppose the spread of Islam. "(Abd al-Wahhab Khallaf (1888-1956) magistrate and professor at the Faculty of Law, Cairo University," The foundations of Islamic law - usool Ilm al-Fiqh "(Al-Qalam Publishing, 1997, 2008) ...


Obama based on religious freedom to defend these actions "Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together," he said. He answered by our statement of 1789, which was not so atheistic since it stated the "natural, inalienable and sacred rights" in the presence of the Supreme Being: Art 10 "No person shall be freedom to hold opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by the Act. "


Conclusion


Obama says need to make peace based on what humans have in common instead of what divides them. We can only share this view. But if one wants to talk about the commonalities and Western Muslims can do this by speaking of virtues such as charity, honesty, politeness, etc., points where the moral Muslims and Judeo-Christian or humanist meet but not by lying on topics such as equality and tolerance.


Before his speech in Cairo, June 2, Obama told Canal Plus: "The United States and the Western world must learn about Islam ", but Barack, if you start by not lying to them about Islam ... He added:" Besides, if you count the number of American Muslims, we see that the U.S. is the One of the largest Muslim countries in the world. "(Obama-the-united-states-are-the-one-of-plus-grand-Muslim countries). Some wondered if he took his dream to reality, the Indonesian population is far greater than the largely Muslim population in the USA.


June 4, he said: "The truth is that the U.S. and Islam are not mutually exclusive. . It was then too afraid to understand: that the U.S. does not conflict with Islam, that is what the activists believe that Islam want Islamic rule over the U.S. and elsewhere, making it "the greatest Muslim country on the planet "...


Elisseievna

Belkin N150 Linux Drivers

polygamy in general, and stupidity ... especially

It is always fun for a blogger to come across a comment about a post that is not the last or second last but he wrote on an article that was written there that for some time. Intimately we say "hey, what I said the other month is still relevant ...".

This experience I just do it or pay the price, as it recently. It all started yesterday when I opened my mail question to put some order into my business. Oddly I came across a post from my blog as it has been over a week since I did not blog. I open the message in question was a comment on a post I wrote about that there is not a month or two but, hold your breath though, two whole years! It would appear that the subject has so pleased the author of the commentary, it wished to leave his opinion (if we can finally express so). It should be noted that the theme of the post is a bit sensationalist since I was talking about polygamy (wa adraka my bad polygamy). This is what

said com: "The infidels are not polygamous, but human beings aware of their human nature. I do not know if you're Muslim or not, but if you are I think many of us Tunisien (starting to sound like a new religion-the Tunisian) completely ignores religion ISLAM AL. from the comments I see that women are against polygamy and most men. some men effeminate in nature or are not married yet "hypocritically" just cons to appeal to women but basically we know what they prefer. Al Islam, my siblings and a divine religion which means that what God decides and what is good for us or not Montesquieux Tahar el Hadded and not even Bourguiba who are beings whose mental capcités are limited and far from seeing the tiny flaws that their plans for themselves and their countries can and especially when these plans come into contardiction direct and clear with the word of Allah. So before you write anything in your comments make a self assessment of your Iman (Faith) in the word of Allah, there is no feelings here (I'm sick, I am dazzled I'm for, I am cons?) all this is worthless for Yawm Al Qiyamah Allah. The question is always "3abdi, amrtouka bi fa lima fa3alta katha katha?". Yahdi ettouansa Allah wa el koll hokkam mahkoumin Amin "... My

commentator describes himself as" Reflechisseur "is in any case, the nickname he gave himself. I just searched the word "Reflechisseur" but I would never find any trace in the dictionary. The only context where this word is used is in the automotive field where the word "Reflechisseur" means a mirror. Puzzled, I wanted to speculate on the choice of this unusual nickname. Two alternatives are are presented to me, or rather were imposed. Either the commentator actually considers itself as a mirror or, for reasons of confusion of ideas, he meant "thinker." Upon reading the content of his comment, I doubt that our friend is mistaken for the model of Rodin. That leaves the hypothesis of "mirror" that seems to apply perfectly to the context, as our friend "thinks" in their raw state, ideas and beliefs he took for an absolute truth and incontrovertible.

To meet our friend I would tell him that I see no objection to the Polygamy is practiced. And this not because it is a divine obligation (as seems to be convinced the majority of "neomusulmans" expert in everything and anything, while the text speaks of "permission"), but rather for social and even cultural . I would even go beyond its traditional polygamy and arbitrary. I am a supporter of omnigamie would be a kind of variable geometry, or polygyny n'al'exclusivité person or the other and both sexes have equal privileges and equal obligations to each other (1 ). In this case, sex (the act and not the gender) is the monopoly of anyone and this will solve once and for all the fantasies, frustrations and complexes of all.

1: Omnigamie: n. type of union allowing various mathematical possibilities. The lovers are united with one swing, but all are mutually united. In omnigamie, many people of different sexes are united, unlike polygamy, which combines several persons of the opposite sex to one person.

Cost For A Jcpenney Hair Cut

No, it does not happen like that in Tn-

I count many friends (s) on Tn-Blogs. All but a few exceptions, are for my virtual accomplices (the) s with whom I share moments of happiness, anger, déconnade of fun, hanging, kindness, solidarity and even futility ... it depends. These friends come from different backgrounds to the image mosaic of the Tn-and that's what blogs do the richness of this area which I am attached to the point of making my daily pilgrimage. Certainly, ideas, beliefs, thoughts, creeds (etc.) of these people that make up the small world that is Tn-blogs interest me and sometimes arouse my curiosity. But if I did it just to try to better understand the other, guess his expectations, be more receptive to his speech ... I never set myself as an end inquisitorial "discovery" of another. Although not a fervent "practicing", I still consider that "there is no difference between an Arab and a non-Arab except in piety." This motto is universal and humans would greatly benefit by adopting it in its multiple interpretations.

For what I speak of Tn-blogs? Because, finally, I gave myself time to read and try to understand a little better this intriguing squabble that the Tunisian blogosphere, has spread and extended to FB. My observation is that I left even more puzzled than before. Between us and I really liked that my feelings have been limited to the perplexity. In other circumstances, I voluntarily kept the silence in this situation is the most advisable thing that can exist. But given the turn taken by this decision beaks with friends yesterday and today's opponents, to preach reconciliation seemed the least that can be done.

The excitement, normally a good sign that reflects the vibrancy and dynamism, has reached unhealthy proportions this time. Not that this happens for the first time, but as an observer of this space for almost four good years, I have a feeling that right now the side of Tn-blogging as he reigns an atmosphere of intellectual disintegration .

I do not want to add controversy to controversy, especially if it is sterile. I just wanted to say this: we in Tunisia was a big problem. This problem is not freedom of speech or censorship or repression or other forms of behavior castrating, gearbox, or ostracism ... our problem everyone without exception is that in spite of our goodwill, our predisposition to good intentions, our kindness, our adherence to democratic principles ... we have the great defect of being committed people. Even those who claim self-employed are engaged in defending their independence to the point of making a partisan cause.

The divergence is the most natural thing that can exist in the world. And disagreement may also be cordial. Also, I beseech you, consider yourself in the right or wrong, not to spoil that for granted with its flaws and shortcomings remains one of the few spaces where you can take a breath of fresh air. This is surely not lacking intellectual pollution in this country. So do not make a garbage Tn-blogs more.

How To Play Tech Deck Live Online

Blogs ... He also ...

You know or you knew. A few weeks ago I gave up women, children and household to afford a trip alone for a whole week. This is sheer hypocrisy to me you say. Yes I know. But it was in the genre "take it or leave it." As an opportunity not likely to appear Twice, I took the risk of embarking on a journey which I will spare you the details ...

For my return, as my plane landed on the tarmac around noon, I agreed in advance with my wife to not come to fetch me at the airport (subject to punish me for my misbehavior) since she had to pick our daughter to school that finished the course in 12:30.

Shortly after landing my plane, my phone rang. At the other end I was pleasantly surprised to hear the mellifluous voice of my sweet and tender half. She told me she was with her father arranged for him to go retrieve his little girl and she was waiting patiently in the lobby of the airport. Once the formalities completed routine, I hastened to take the exit door. What was my surprise when I discovered that my wife had not come alone to my research, but it made s'ait accompanied by the little bundle of joy. At the sight of my head, the latter like a monkey discovering the presence of an alien around, stared at me long before a smile on her lips and letting go the word most delicious that can be heard from the lips of an angel, "Dad! . Then he came running towards me. I embraced the strongest possible against me. Him, he looked at me then s'enfouillait in me as if trying to penetrate my inner. In his eyes there was like a reproach: Where were you? Why hast thou been absent all this time? ...

He clung to me and no longer wanted to let me go. We arrive at the house, he follows me everywhere. I have to pee even let me in with the interior of the bathroom. The night he insisted on sleeping in our bed L. He slept while standing tight against my body, grabbing the shirt that I used as pajamas. I slept badly but I was filled.

The same story I experienced the first time that there are five years with my oldest daughter. At that time I was returning from a trip and my flight arrived shortly after midnight. Obviously my wife is not picked me up at the airport in May she was waiting impatiently at home. Our daughter by cons, who was two years old, she slept a deep sleep. When I got home, she noticed my presence but she could not sleep lute cons. That does it last all night she also clung to me as if to signify that she holds me and she is not ready to let me escape a second time. It was a strange sensation and pleasing to both. And in the morning was the "man marking". These kids really weird!