Globalization is compatible with democracy?
This question obviously nobody is laying, as it is established as a dogma inviolable and indisputable that globalization and democracy go hand in hand.
The success of this crude propaganda speaks volumes about the atrophy of brain capacity of our leaders and our intellectuals, just as it says a lot about the mental and moral development of people for whom this new religion is imposed.
The gatekeepers of this "revelation", and those that ensure the sustainability and the absolutism of this doctrine, are not those ignorant people that usually refers to this feature. Wolves know, from a story well known to the majority, dressing up in her grandmother to dupe the naive and irresponsible. The fiercest guardians of this quasi-mystical ideology, is in truth the cohort of journalists who are behind this concept which has regenerated the anathema secular heresy, to replace it from politically correct.
Woe to those who might question the validity of the canon of the new dominant ideology in whose name it is imperative to evangelize all peoples of the planet, even at the cost of the worst economic violence, which will almost invariably by the violence of war. A free thinker comes to hypothesize that this belief is based on the foundation of a moron absurd sophism, and our media cursers of the dominant ideology will stand with conformism scary As it is the shadow of totalitarianism, to denounce and crush the Antichrist, this apostate, this tool of Satan which must be cast shame and calumny.
In this vein, we present for illustration of the foregoing, the case of Claude Allegre, ugly duckling of the intelligentsia and political scientist who dares to point an accusing finger on the couillonnades that underpin the new priests of ecology, we attempt to impose the tax rituals that will convert the wanderers of globalization. For make no mistake about it, the ecology is the pageantry of "virtues" must come dressed vices of this doctrine only venal partisan concerns.
Returning to the question I posed as an epigraph to this article, if democracy is the exercise of popular sovereignty itself, that sovereignty can not be usurped by another who would not After this people. We have here one of the cornerstones of Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789.
But the essence of globalization is composed of principles, regulations, codes, conventions, norms, obligations, which were, essentially, concocted by the authorities with no elective legitimacy (and therefore legal), and always alien to the peoples to whom they decree to impose its dogma, canon law, violating their sovereignty .
Our corrupt leaders, the more legal sense of the word, ignorant and incompetent in addition, the two are, alas! compatible (proof of their disastrous balance sheets of the last thirty years), became the zealous servants of this dogmatic egregore stateless and sprawling. They not only became the zealous servants, but they are also, in their respective countries, the inquisitors charged either forcibly convert the infidels or bad faith or pyres to devote to contempt, disrepute, indignity, ridicule and degradation, and intellectual morality.
However, the result produced by this disastrous sectarian ideology, fanatical, intolerant, should long since opening the eyes of the hardiest spirits, let alone the more subtle, if not moral, virtuous, we Judge for yourself:
Allowing Chinese manufacturers (but not only) to come and sell their products local soil of a country that imposes its own industrial and social norms, wage, environmental, taxation that do not respect these foreign manufacturers, it is not enforcing the laws on fair competition, but those perfectly unfair competition, and I am ready to change his mind if one shows me otherwise. It is easy to understand that multinationals benefiting from the benefits of tax havens, and the game of clever combinations and international tax law, are the first to convert to globalization. It is more profitable for the principal shareholders of these corporations to an employee work for 100 euros per month (often less), without the constraints of a labor code protecting him, and local tax laws, rather than pay 1000 euros more important positions, for the same service.
The local industry, faced with this unfair competition, has no choice but to die or to use the mechanisms of globalization to relocate its production, thereby transferring some of centuries of accumulated knowledge do, effort and sacrifice, to give, by looting organize, to nations that have often no more to offer than their counterparts corruption and totalitarianism.
Today, our leaders, who try to take people for what he has the annoying habit of letting Published: ignorant, illogical, and servile herd, we explain their astonishment to see that the nation deindustrialization. .. If there were a Nobel Prize one day of hypocrisy, no doubt that after having been an ardent proselyte of sectarian doctrine called globalization, come proclaiming he does not understand why the fatality hit France, will be a serious nominee for this award.
While the world population explodes and is not intended that this population growth continues in the decades to come. While it is already difficult to eat properly all the existing population. Globalization, through its mechanisms of unfair competition, transforms all actors in the agricultural world, not serfs, but in real modern slaves. Time exhausting work, for pay less than what is given to welfare recipients who have no working stress or financial liability, or risk of bankruptcy ... When is more advantageous to a buying group (hyper market = multinational) to bring in fruit and vegetables by air from the antipodes rather than properly paying local producers, who are bound and gagged by the laws, regulations, obligations, wage restraints, tax, European, there is also a clear violation of public interest (common good), breaking the principle of equal rights and duties contained in the republican pact.
The principle of sovereignty resides essentially in the nation, no body, no individual may exercise authority that does not emanate expressly is that states in Article 2 of the Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789. Now, I know, he never specifically emanating from the nation that it violates its own Constitution by restoring the privileges of an aristocracy of stateless plutocrats at the expense of members of society who do not. It has never been ruled by the Nation that agriculture should be stifled for most serve the greedy few large agribusiness, and financial. It has never been demonstrated by the sovereign people as unequal treatment can substitute for this fundamental principle of republican pact as it is beautifully defined by Article I of this incomparable Declaration of Human Rights and the Citizen 1789 :
Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. social distinctions can be based only on common utility.
Globalization does nothing and respects the principle of popular sovereignty or the principle of equality based democracy or the principle of utility common basis of Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789 . A country like France, I should say especially this country, more than any other, has every right to enforce equality of fair competition, imposing fiscal constraints and social import that would confront the local productions. This is not protectionism, it is simply the rule of law and especially the Constitution, the basis of fair competition, equal, fair and moral.
never forget, for those who might still be tempted to sell the benefits of globalization, the balance the latter consists of widespread pollution, a plundering of the planet's resources to be rapidly untenable, especially a false improvement of living conditions of individuals, since this "improvement" temporary, based on a debt if whereas it is now impossible to say how he will ever be repaid except by blood sacrifices and increased poverty, as is beginning to be the case for Greece, but this is the first country a list that will rapidly grow.
Not only does globalization is a doctrine contrary to democracy and human rights, but it is a moment of intoxication of a civilization that will be followed by a long hangover, past history shows with clockwork regularity.
Hoping that the state of misery that will inevitably occur in countries that are fooled by his ideology as a smoker, a sectarian religion, will not end violent confrontations and deadly, even warlike !
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
0 comments:
Post a Comment