The bottom of the case Sarkozy - Woerth - Bettencourt.
Far be it from me to come and give my two cents on what makes the current news on the secret funding of election campaigns.
believe that such a thing is possible in France, from a political gent whose recent past demonstrates his angelic purity, would be proof of an evil spirit, if not a really bad time. No, Francois Mitterrand was not the basis for the enormous undertaking procurement of pumping through the body URBA, among other tricks of the same species mafia ... No, the mayor of Paris, Jacques Chirac, did not receive bags of tickets and some Méric from the same origin: the corruption ... No, Edouard Balladur did not fund his presidential campaign by other than gifts of generous donors who came to attend his rallies with force of 500 euro notes in his pockets. 500 euro note that everyone knows it's the cut that runs only in the middle traffickers of all kinds, as well as corruption., not in the pockets of ordinary citizens. No, de Maistre has not received the Legion of Honour for anything other than his incredible dedication to an elderly person. Exceptional dedication, because Conversely thousands of volunteers doing the same thing with several seniors him he is cons rewards strength and luxurious gifts of all kinds, "that the nation deserves.
Far be it from me absurd to believe that such malpractices have been, are or will be possible. If such a calamity should happen one day, I have no doubt that justice so quick to punish any breach of the Highway Traffic Act, any ignorance to the plethora of stupid laws that hangs over the most modest citizen, will show an unrelenting severity against such offenders seriously undermine by their lack of honesty and decency, the basics of democracy, the Republic and of equal rights.
My purpose in this case Sarkozy-Woert - Bettencourt, is on another level, the bluster of our corrupt leaders, who - as I show in my latest book: The dictatorship to French - Imbued with their insolent privileges, for years now despise the rule of law common to come, unfortunately when we dare to attack their pseudo moral integrity, whining piteously before the microphones and cameras, none of which is default, and most importantly a prime time, to proclaim and protest against the violation of presumption of innocence ...
champion of duplicity and deceit I named: Michele Alliot-Marie, former Minister of the Army, which is known only within that dark shenanigans going on even modestly covered by the sordid secret defense, so contrary to the principle of transparency that builds loyalty and honesty. It has been one of Former Ministers of Interior, which is known how little they make the presumption of innocence by making our country one that, among the most developed countries, the greatest practical number of police custody and pretrial detention, under pretexts as inept as the old lettres de cachet, such as: disturbing public order in the interpretation more idle than the cop will be the most cantankerous and bounded (the two are not incompatible), a situation that is beyond our limited understanding in the exercise of its functions.
Michele Alliot-Marie, our current Attorney General, who comes to the rescue of this poor Woerth, trumpeting it enjoys the presumption of innocence when he is charged or in custody , and parallel to it, it never occurs to all cases infinitely many strong (per million), the presumption of innocence is violated by a judicial orders, and services of forces covered by the order the privilege of an insolent technostructure not having to meet the LAW. Principle also the constitutional presumption of innocence, as contained in the Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789.
Height of hypocrisy, she came to say, always a prime time, it should not violate the one hand the presumption of innocence, and that we should not second , convict without evidence. Personally I fully subscribe to these principles, but where I am amazed that when the master of the chancery is telling us what not to do when its services are exactly the opposite. I will not go on million acts of violations of the presumption of innocence that every citizen is subjected to daily, and never raised any emotion from our Attorney General, but as to say that we should not condemn evidence, then I think it pushes it beyond the cynical reason. Would she spent in profit or loss because of faulty memory, the fact that in France it is possible to be regularly condemned not on evidence but only on the firm belief that jurors can be highly manipulated by supervision of magistrates who, coincidentally, always get judgments along the lines of public opinion to guide the movement that our rulers can exploit skillfully ...
As figurehead of righteousness, equality of rights, respect for republican ethics and morals, there is no doubt that if we do that Michele Alliot-Marie to offer the social body , then it is more democracy and imp at law, but of Sodom and Gomorrah and banana republic.
Mr. Woerth, with his air of sad cocker just told us before the television cameras, the newspaper for 20 hours, the penalty he be accused of "unfairly" and seeing his honor thrown to the mercy of public opinion without any regard for the respect, again, of his presumption of innocence. He was head of the administration, which in history has been less respectful of the presumption of innocence. Administration, as I show in my book dictatorship to French (all parliamentarians and ministers have received), is one that respects the É rule of law when it suits , that might seem a hair insolent. Where it becomes the greatest comic is that 24 March 2009, this gentleman, during the 13-hour television news has come to lecture on public morality by denouncing the severance benefits that a point were perfectly legally incontestable, the former CEO of Valeo: Thierry Morin. At that time I wrote about this blog (article still appears) to denounce this act of treachery from one of the highest personages of the state, and infringed Article 5 of the Declaration Rights of Man and Citizen of 1789. Binding declaration law as stated at the beginning of the 1958 Constitution.
That Ms. Bettencourt is constantly under the watchful eye and "protector" of the techno more corrupt than we ever had, given the importance of the jam it represents, there is not surprising. But the most eminent representatives of government, under the authority and instructions of the President of the Republic, are publicly trample an already very ill Democracy, rule of law, respect for the Constitution, the Declaration of Human Rights and Citizen of 1789 , and above all justice without which there is no freedom possible, speaks volumes about the techno, our rulers and puppet Members who have exchanged the mandate they received from the sovereign people against small yard privileges ...
is what shows in the open, the bottom of the case Sarkozy - Woerth - Bettencourt, and it is far more calamitous than any secret funding campaign ...
-------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
0 comments:
Post a Comment