Inbreeding degenerative members of the techno corrupt government.
I had in a previous section, revealed the deception of smoky Constitutional Council in its decision as irresponsible Baroque which was to denounce the practice of police custody as contrary the Constitution, while granting (as if it was free), right up to the executive, to continue its arbitrary use until July 2011 ...
This violation of every principle of law and the founding pact of the Republic has not caught the attention of many politicians, which is no surprise to me, and virtually no journalist by no lawyer ... That says a lot about the state of active and passive corruption of our society and all members of society ...
Today, for those who still come to doubt the correctness of my observations, we have a new feature that only confirms the correctness of both political and legal status of dictatorship that characterizes our corrupt government, as I had the opportunity to describe, with supporting evidence, in my latest book: The dictatorship the French.
This new element is the decision today by the President of the Constitutional Council does not connect to justice exchanges between members of the Council acting on the validation of accounts of the presidential campaign of Edouard Balladur. Parts to come inform the judge Renaud Van Ruymbeke charge of the investigation, more and more sulfurous, for the highest state authorities in case of attack Karachi.
First refusal goes against the authorization of the Minister of Justice, Michel Alliot-Marie, who had assured October 20, 2010 at the National Assembly, that justice could have access to internal debates within the Constitutional Council, and secondly, it is in violation of the principles of the Constitution, also known Nature, Sacred, inalienable and indefeasible , I am referring to Article 15 of the Bill of Rights Man and the Citizen of 1789, the Law of laws that the Constitutional Council is responsible for so-called safeguard against the totalitarian temptations, as alas! our country has seen too often before the Revolution, but after all ...
The excuse is at least as ridiculous as grossly stupid. If every citizen in this country is held accountable to justice when it expresses a wish, it seems surreal to say the least imagine that there could be both in the body of the executive than in the legislature, individuals or authorities that can escape this obligation, which would, once again, contrary to Article 6 of the DDHC which imposes the principle of common law can only exist without any privileges since for the DDHC of 1789 is applicable, it was declared the abolition of all privileges.
If we can hardly accept an arbitrary form of the secrecy of deliberations and votes vis-à-vis the general public - although this is legally questionable given the fact that no law, no regulation can be counterproductive one section of the DDHC, whose Article 15 mentioned above - the secret of junk (not even a secret defense so often used to hide many shenanigans), can not be enforced against the judiciary, independent the other two powers, by provisions of Article 16 of the Declaration of Human Rights and the Citizen, whose citizen Jean Louis Debre is negligible for a perfect insolence and sufficiency which is the hallmark of pedants members of the nomenklatura of this techno corrupt .
The Constitutional Council, which has never been anything but a trick trying to give credibility to what he had none, reveals more and more its duplicity. On one side is draped, as the defect in the garb of virtue, in the appearance of wisdom above contingencies sordid political debates, and the other as all its members are corrupt from the techno, it behaves like a tribal organization as evil and hinders the proper functioning of justice and thus undermines the FREEDOM, our liberties, because there is never free without justice.
The Constitutional Council is a government draconian, contrary to the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen of 1789, as stipulated in Article 2 are clear:
Article 2 - The goal of any political association is the conservation of natural and inalienable rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, safety and resistance oppression.
But he remains in this country a few free spirits for even indignant and informed of such malfeasance?
This violation of every principle of law and the founding pact of the Republic has not caught the attention of many politicians, which is no surprise to me, and virtually no journalist by no lawyer ... That says a lot about the state of active and passive corruption of our society and all members of society ...
Today, for those who still come to doubt the correctness of my observations, we have a new feature that only confirms the correctness of both political and legal status of dictatorship that characterizes our corrupt government, as I had the opportunity to describe, with supporting evidence, in my latest book: The dictatorship the French.
This new element is the decision today by the President of the Constitutional Council does not connect to justice exchanges between members of the Council acting on the validation of accounts of the presidential campaign of Edouard Balladur. Parts to come inform the judge Renaud Van Ruymbeke charge of the investigation, more and more sulfurous, for the highest state authorities in case of attack Karachi.
First refusal goes against the authorization of the Minister of Justice, Michel Alliot-Marie, who had assured October 20, 2010 at the National Assembly, that justice could have access to internal debates within the Constitutional Council, and secondly, it is in violation of the principles of the Constitution, also known Nature, Sacred, inalienable and indefeasible , I am referring to Article 15 of the Bill of Rights Man and the Citizen of 1789, the Law of laws that the Constitutional Council is responsible for so-called safeguard against the totalitarian temptations, as alas! our country has seen too often before the Revolution, but after all ...
The excuse is at least as ridiculous as grossly stupid. If every citizen in this country is held accountable to justice when it expresses a wish, it seems surreal to say the least imagine that there could be both in the body of the executive than in the legislature, individuals or authorities that can escape this obligation, which would, once again, contrary to Article 6 of the DDHC which imposes the principle of common law can only exist without any privileges since for the DDHC of 1789 is applicable, it was declared the abolition of all privileges.
If we can hardly accept an arbitrary form of the secrecy of deliberations and votes vis-à-vis the general public - although this is legally questionable given the fact that no law, no regulation can be counterproductive one section of the DDHC, whose Article 15 mentioned above - the secret of junk (not even a secret defense so often used to hide many shenanigans), can not be enforced against the judiciary, independent the other two powers, by provisions of Article 16 of the Declaration of Human Rights and the Citizen, whose citizen Jean Louis Debre is negligible for a perfect insolence and sufficiency which is the hallmark of pedants members of the nomenklatura of this techno corrupt .
The Constitutional Council, which has never been anything but a trick trying to give credibility to what he had none, reveals more and more its duplicity. On one side is draped, as the defect in the garb of virtue, in the appearance of wisdom above contingencies sordid political debates, and the other as all its members are corrupt from the techno, it behaves like a tribal organization as evil and hinders the proper functioning of justice and thus undermines the FREEDOM, our liberties, because there is never free without justice.
The Constitutional Council is a government draconian, contrary to the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen of 1789, as stipulated in Article 2 are clear:
Article 2 - The goal of any political association is the conservation of natural and inalienable rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, safety and resistance oppression.
But he remains in this country a few free spirits for even indignant and informed of such malfeasance?
Increasingly, I doubt it!
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
0 comments:
Post a Comment