It is always fun for a blogger to come across a comment about a post that is not the last or second last but he wrote on an article that was written there that for some time. Intimately we say "hey, what I said the other month is still relevant ...".
This experience I just do it or pay the price, as it recently. It all started yesterday when I opened my mail question to put some order into my business. Oddly I came across a post from my blog as it has been over a week since I did not blog. I open the message in question was a comment on a post I wrote about that there is not a month or two but, hold your breath though, two whole years! It would appear that the subject has so pleased the author of the commentary, it wished to leave his opinion (if we can finally express so). It should be noted that the theme of the post is a bit sensationalist since I was talking about polygamy (wa adraka my bad polygamy). This is what
said com: "The infidels are not polygamous, but human beings aware of their human nature. I do not know if you're Muslim or not, but if you are I think many of us Tunisien (starting to sound like a new religion-the Tunisian) completely ignores religion ISLAM AL. from the comments I see that women are against polygamy and most men. some men effeminate in nature or are not married yet "hypocritically" just cons to appeal to women but basically we know what they prefer. Al Islam, my siblings and a divine religion which means that what God decides and what is good for us or not Montesquieux Tahar el Hadded and not even Bourguiba who are beings whose mental capcités are limited and far from seeing the tiny flaws that their plans for themselves and their countries can and especially when these plans come into contardiction direct and clear with the word of Allah. So before you write anything in your comments make a self assessment of your Iman (Faith) in the word of Allah, there is no feelings here (I'm sick, I am dazzled I'm for, I am cons?) all this is worthless for Yawm Al Qiyamah Allah. The question is always "3abdi, amrtouka bi fa lima fa3alta katha katha?". Yahdi ettouansa Allah wa el koll hokkam mahkoumin Amin "... My
commentator describes himself as" Reflechisseur "is in any case, the nickname he gave himself. I just searched the word "Reflechisseur" but I would never find any trace in the dictionary. The only context where this word is used is in the automotive field where the word "Reflechisseur" means a mirror. Puzzled, I wanted to speculate on the choice of this unusual nickname. Two alternatives are are presented to me, or rather were imposed. Either the commentator actually considers itself as a mirror or, for reasons of confusion of ideas, he meant "thinker." Upon reading the content of his comment, I doubt that our friend is mistaken for the model of Rodin. That leaves the hypothesis of "mirror" that seems to apply perfectly to the context, as our friend "thinks" in their raw state, ideas and beliefs he took for an absolute truth and incontrovertible.
To meet our friend I would tell him that I see no objection to the Polygamy is practiced. And this not because it is a divine obligation (as seems to be convinced the majority of "neomusulmans" expert in everything and anything, while the text speaks of "permission"), but rather for social and even cultural . I would even go beyond its traditional polygamy and arbitrary. I am a supporter of omnigamie would be a kind of variable geometry, or polygyny n'al'exclusivité person or the other and both sexes have equal privileges and equal obligations to each other (1 ). In this case, sex (the act and not the gender) is the monopoly of anyone and this will solve once and for all the fantasies, frustrations and complexes of all.
1: Omnigamie: n. type of union allowing various mathematical possibilities. The lovers are united with one swing, but all are mutually united. In omnigamie, many people of different sexes are united, unlike polygamy, which combines several persons of the opposite sex to one person.
This experience I just do it or pay the price, as it recently. It all started yesterday when I opened my mail question to put some order into my business. Oddly I came across a post from my blog as it has been over a week since I did not blog. I open the message in question was a comment on a post I wrote about that there is not a month or two but, hold your breath though, two whole years! It would appear that the subject has so pleased the author of the commentary, it wished to leave his opinion (if we can finally express so). It should be noted that the theme of the post is a bit sensationalist since I was talking about polygamy (wa adraka my bad polygamy). This is what
said com: "The infidels are not polygamous, but human beings aware of their human nature. I do not know if you're Muslim or not, but if you are I think many of us Tunisien (starting to sound like a new religion-the Tunisian) completely ignores religion ISLAM AL. from the comments I see that women are against polygamy and most men. some men effeminate in nature or are not married yet "hypocritically" just cons to appeal to women but basically we know what they prefer. Al Islam, my siblings and a divine religion which means that what God decides and what is good for us or not Montesquieux Tahar el Hadded and not even Bourguiba who are beings whose mental capcités are limited and far from seeing the tiny flaws that their plans for themselves and their countries can and especially when these plans come into contardiction direct and clear with the word of Allah. So before you write anything in your comments make a self assessment of your Iman (Faith) in the word of Allah, there is no feelings here (I'm sick, I am dazzled I'm for, I am cons?) all this is worthless for Yawm Al Qiyamah Allah. The question is always "3abdi, amrtouka bi fa lima fa3alta katha katha?". Yahdi ettouansa Allah wa el koll hokkam mahkoumin Amin "... My
commentator describes himself as" Reflechisseur "is in any case, the nickname he gave himself. I just searched the word "Reflechisseur" but I would never find any trace in the dictionary. The only context where this word is used is in the automotive field where the word "Reflechisseur" means a mirror. Puzzled, I wanted to speculate on the choice of this unusual nickname. Two alternatives are are presented to me, or rather were imposed. Either the commentator actually considers itself as a mirror or, for reasons of confusion of ideas, he meant "thinker." Upon reading the content of his comment, I doubt that our friend is mistaken for the model of Rodin. That leaves the hypothesis of "mirror" that seems to apply perfectly to the context, as our friend "thinks" in their raw state, ideas and beliefs he took for an absolute truth and incontrovertible.
To meet our friend I would tell him that I see no objection to the Polygamy is practiced. And this not because it is a divine obligation (as seems to be convinced the majority of "neomusulmans" expert in everything and anything, while the text speaks of "permission"), but rather for social and even cultural . I would even go beyond its traditional polygamy and arbitrary. I am a supporter of omnigamie would be a kind of variable geometry, or polygyny n'al'exclusivité person or the other and both sexes have equal privileges and equal obligations to each other (1 ). In this case, sex (the act and not the gender) is the monopoly of anyone and this will solve once and for all the fantasies, frustrations and complexes of all.
1: Omnigamie: n. type of union allowing various mathematical possibilities. The lovers are united with one swing, but all are mutually united. In omnigamie, many people of different sexes are united, unlike polygamy, which combines several persons of the opposite sex to one person.
0 comments:
Post a Comment