Propriety is that we do not say that the good of our dead. Morality as well. Speaking of dead in recent days, we just lost a political figure who has the discretion of the principal vector of its roadmap. I speak, you've probably guessed, the late Habib Bourguiba Jr. newspapers, as is customary, commented on his departure. Each in its own way of course, although all we did with some taciturnity and a almost laconic tone. Prudence and reserve force would be inclined to say with these times when any reference to the recent past can be an affront to the present.
Except that some newspapers have seen fit to insert in the biographies they dedicated to the deceased and their columns published on a detail to mention the relevance of which still raises some questions. First came the newspaper "As-Sabah" in its edition of yesterday, which hinted slyly. Then came the turn of cloth "Achourouk" to say the most thought possible. Both publications are have investigated the past of Bourguiba Jr. highlighting the fact that he came into the world shortly before his parents' marriage was declared legally. They suggest that a certain illegitimacy and a blemish or stain on the dignity of man. Otherwise, why would they dwell on a detail person who does and who is a retail end. Unless the intent is to make a double shot: slander Bourguiba Jr. (son born out of illegitimate because the legal framework) and at the same time his father (guilty of concubinage) and a little depressing the nail. To those
their feathers that inspired them to lay such a meanness, I would ask them: What more legitimacy can be given to his offspring when he was already bequeathed his personal and family surname? Would not it have been better to ignore the death of this gentleman to persevere in this blind fury and spiteful to deny any gratitude to Bourguiba?
And we dare say that Tunisia is proud of his tunisianité, his homeland and its history. What hypocrisy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment