The Swiss do not want minarets home. And then? Or is the problem? Nowhere, if one assumes that each nation is sovereign and free in his choice. Except for the express, the Swiss have felt a pressing need to say loud and clear. They told the world of the most clear and explicit as possible.
This will have been missed if she had not fallen in the political field. And when it moves into the morass of politics one must know what to expect afterwards. To express that refusal Swiss needed to do through a referendum, making the case a matter of state. Suddenly, he is quite a hype that the issue raised and continues to do so. This applies both inside and outside the borders of countries in the Laughing Cow.
They said therefore that the Swiss are sovereign to make all the decisions they deem best for their country (like the Switzerland of Africa elsewhere). Except that here it is, trying to justify the decision to ban minarets, a good majority of the Swiss saw fit to report that, among other considerations that have led to vote against the presence of forms phalloides home is the lack of reciprocity in Muslim countries.
This argument intrigued me by its incongruity. It betrays an ignorance that grotesque Swiss in particular and Westerners in general have about Muslim countries. Without going into details that I can not prove it by concrete examples, I would point out that, until proven otherwise, Muslim countries are in their overwhelming majority of exporting and importing non-migration. If the Arab and Muslim world need to build churches did not feel it is not (only) because of a reluctance or denial to build temples other than Islam, but simply because these countries have not yet experienced an exodus of people of Christian faith in the image of what happens in European countries that receive them every day thousands of people of Muslim faith and others who express the need to erect temples where they can worship and practice their faith.
Furthermore, this case, by elevating the status of the referendum, and thus committing the will of an entire nation, could turn into an accident that will feel the suffering incessantly. Switzerland, we already know, is not his first political blunder. Recently, the Swiss country has had to be humiliated to the point of lowering his pants to remedy a trivial matter of justice that should have stayed in the lap of the courts. The case in question, which has become a fact of state just because of the involvement of one of Gaddafi's son, had all the chances to resolve without causing waves. But it was not rely on the willingness of some circles to politicize the case. The result is well known. Instead of focusing on the legitimacy of the position of the Swiss justice is a showdown against Gaddafi that Switzerland has preferred afford. Result: Bern has had to resign to formally apologize.
This time with the case of minarets in Switzerland will not only make a fool silly the likes of Gaddafi. The Swiss, consciously or not, opted to lie on his back two forces as formidable one than the other Muslim populations, overly stigmatized and exceeded, and magnates and representatives of sovereign wealth funds, to teach that there are more populist Swiss populist than they, will compete to see who inflict the most degrading humiliation these brainless Helvetas.
The tragedy in all this is that those who will pay the price it will be members of the Muslim community in Swiss land that, paradoxically, is believed to neutral ground.
This will have been missed if she had not fallen in the political field. And when it moves into the morass of politics one must know what to expect afterwards. To express that refusal Swiss needed to do through a referendum, making the case a matter of state. Suddenly, he is quite a hype that the issue raised and continues to do so. This applies both inside and outside the borders of countries in the Laughing Cow.
They said therefore that the Swiss are sovereign to make all the decisions they deem best for their country (like the Switzerland of Africa elsewhere). Except that here it is, trying to justify the decision to ban minarets, a good majority of the Swiss saw fit to report that, among other considerations that have led to vote against the presence of forms phalloides home is the lack of reciprocity in Muslim countries.
This argument intrigued me by its incongruity. It betrays an ignorance that grotesque Swiss in particular and Westerners in general have about Muslim countries. Without going into details that I can not prove it by concrete examples, I would point out that, until proven otherwise, Muslim countries are in their overwhelming majority of exporting and importing non-migration. If the Arab and Muslim world need to build churches did not feel it is not (only) because of a reluctance or denial to build temples other than Islam, but simply because these countries have not yet experienced an exodus of people of Christian faith in the image of what happens in European countries that receive them every day thousands of people of Muslim faith and others who express the need to erect temples where they can worship and practice their faith.
Furthermore, this case, by elevating the status of the referendum, and thus committing the will of an entire nation, could turn into an accident that will feel the suffering incessantly. Switzerland, we already know, is not his first political blunder. Recently, the Swiss country has had to be humiliated to the point of lowering his pants to remedy a trivial matter of justice that should have stayed in the lap of the courts. The case in question, which has become a fact of state just because of the involvement of one of Gaddafi's son, had all the chances to resolve without causing waves. But it was not rely on the willingness of some circles to politicize the case. The result is well known. Instead of focusing on the legitimacy of the position of the Swiss justice is a showdown against Gaddafi that Switzerland has preferred afford. Result: Bern has had to resign to formally apologize.
This time with the case of minarets in Switzerland will not only make a fool silly the likes of Gaddafi. The Swiss, consciously or not, opted to lie on his back two forces as formidable one than the other Muslim populations, overly stigmatized and exceeded, and magnates and representatives of sovereign wealth funds, to teach that there are more populist Swiss populist than they, will compete to see who inflict the most degrading humiliation these brainless Helvetas.
The tragedy in all this is that those who will pay the price it will be members of the Muslim community in Swiss land that, paradoxically, is believed to neutral ground.
0 comments:
Post a Comment